These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14596300)

  • 21. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Radiation dose evaluation in a photon-counting digital mammography unit].
    Matsubara K; Matsumoto C; Mochiya Y; Toda K; Noto K; Koshida K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 May; 70(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 24858289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography.
    Aminah M; Ng KH; Abdullah BJ; Jamal N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 20938762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.
    Toroi P; Zanca F; Young KC; van Ongeval C; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 17268798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.
    Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range.
    Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Suzuki S; Chida K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 28300371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Fibrofatty Breast using Target/filter Combinations in Two Digital Mammography Systems.
    Alkhalifah K; Asbeutah A; Brindhaban A
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2020; 10():56. PubMed ID: 33024611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
    Smathers RL; Boone JM; Lee LJ; Berns EA; Miller RA; Wright AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computation of conversion coefficients relating air Kerma to Hp(0.07,alpha), Hp(10,alpha), and H*(10) for x-ray narrow spectrum from 40 to 140 kV.
    Kharrati H; Zarrad B
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 15000613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography.
    Bemelmans F; Marshall NW; Dedulle A; Tri Wigati K; Ivanovic S; Binst J; Struelens L; De Hauwere A; Devillers M; Bosmans H
    Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():242-249. PubMed ID: 34311162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of mean glandular dose and modulation transfer function for different tube potentials and target-filter combinations in computed radiography mammography.
    Abdul Aziz SA; Mohd Saparudin AK; Harun AZ
    Malays J Med Sci; 2013 May; 20(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 23966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.