648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14596305)
1. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation.
Chow JC; Leung MK; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3619-30. PubMed ID: 19746796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Batho, ETAR and Monte Carlo dose calculation methods in CT based patient models.
du Plessis FC; Willemse CA; Lötter MG; Goedhals L
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 11339755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric variation due to the photon beam energy in the small-animal irradiation: a Monte Carlo study.
Chow JC; Leung MK; Lindsay PE; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5322-9. PubMed ID: 21089767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation.
Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers.
Spezi E; Lewis DG; Smith CW
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):3007-29. PubMed ID: 11720360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculation of monitor unit for electron arc therapy.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1571-8. PubMed ID: 20443478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM.
Francescon P; Cavedon C; Reccanello S; Cora S
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1579-87. PubMed ID: 10947261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
