These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
644 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14596305)
1. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs. Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation. Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium. Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations. Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code. Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation. Chow JC; Leung MK; Van Dyk J Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3619-30. PubMed ID: 19746796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Batho, ETAR and Monte Carlo dose calculation methods in CT based patient models. du Plessis FC; Willemse CA; Lötter MG; Goedhals L Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 11339755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy. Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields. Jones AO; Das IJ Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric variation due to the photon beam energy in the small-animal irradiation: a Monte Carlo study. Chow JC; Leung MK; Lindsay PE; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5322-9. PubMed ID: 21089767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation. Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media. Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers. Spezi E; Lewis DG; Smith CW Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):3007-29. PubMed ID: 11720360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms. Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams. Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculation of monitor unit for electron arc therapy. Chow JC; Jiang R Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1571-8. PubMed ID: 20443478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance. Ali I; Ahmad S Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM. Francescon P; Cavedon C; Reccanello S; Cora S Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1579-87. PubMed ID: 10947261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]