These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459639)

  • 1. Bromocriptine-induced implantation failure in mice: failure of the stud male to protect pregnancy.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1992 Jul; 30(7):648-9. PubMed ID: 1459639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stud male-induced protection of implantation in food-deprived mice: masking effect of an artificial scent on pheromonal odour.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):371-2. PubMed ID: 2351421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure of familiar males to prevent alien male-induced implantation block (the Bruce effect) in laboratory mice.
    Thomas KJ; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):996-7. PubMed ID: 2620941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nutritional stress-induced implantation failure in newly inseminated mice: effect of the presence of stud males.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1989; 94(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2630305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The male-induced implantation failure (the Bruce effect) in laboratory mice: investigations on luteal failure in pregnancy-blocked females.
    Rajendren G; Dominic CJ
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1988 Sep; 92(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3229446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The male-induced implantation failure (the Bruce effect) in mice: effect of exogenous progesterone on maintenance of pregnancy in male-exposed females.
    Rajendren G; Dominic CJ
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1993; 101(6):356-9. PubMed ID: 8157091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nutritional stress-induced implantation failure in laboratory mice: inhibition by continuous illumination.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 7558180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rat-induced disruption of early pregnancy in mice and its prevention by the stud male.
    Kumar A; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1996 Mar; 34(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8781027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The male-induced pregnancy block (the Bruce effect) in mice: re-evaluation of the ability of exogenous progesterone in preventing implantation failure.
    Rajendren G; Dominic CJ
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1987 Apr; 89(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 3609162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protective effect of ectopic pituitary graft on nutritional stress-induced implantation failure in mice.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):672-3. PubMed ID: 1794855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prolactin suppression during pre and post-implantation periods on rat uterine glucosamine synthase activity.
    Vijayan E; Jayashree J
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):386-8. PubMed ID: 8359840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stud male protection of implantation in food-deprived mice: evaluation of the involvement of olfactory-vomeronasal systems.
    Archunan G; Dominic CJ
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1990 Sep; 96(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 2279524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure of adrenalectomy to prevent the male-induced pregnancy block (Bruce effect) in mice.
    Sahu SC; Dominic CJ
    Endokrinologie; 1981 Dec; 78(2-3):156-60. PubMed ID: 7199422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-implantation fasting does not induce pregnancy failure in newly inseminated mice.
    Archunan G; Aruldhas MM; Govindarajulu P
    Acta Physiol Hung; 1994; 82(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 7785448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imprinting of a Nonpheromonal Cue and Its Protective Effect on Alien Male-Induced Implantation Failure in Mice.
    Thomas KJ; Preeji KP; Ranjith S
    Chem Senses; 2018 Aug; 43(7):523-527. PubMed ID: 29982306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of pseudopregnancy in pregnancy-blocked mice by re-exposure to stud males.
    Thomas KJ; Dominic CJ
    Physiol Behav; 1987; 41(5):515-7. PubMed ID: 3432409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration of the luteotrophic memory of the stud male odors formed in the female mouse.
    Acharya KK; Dominic CJ
    J Exp Zool; 1997 Dec; 279(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 9399432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for the involvement of dopaminergic neurons in the pregnancy block effect.
    Marchlewska-Koj A; JemioĊ‚o
    Neuroendocrinology; 1978; 26(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 683469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involvement of the vomeronasal organ and prolactin in pheromonal induction of delayed implantation in mice.
    Bellringer JF; Pratt HP; Keverne EB
    J Reprod Fertil; 1980 May; 59(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 7401039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male-induced implantation failure (the Bruce effect) in mice: protective effect of familiar males on implantation.
    Kumar A; Dominic CJ
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Dec; 54(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 8295959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.