175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14597361)
21. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
Zakaria GA; Schütte W
Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of absorbed dose in clinical radiotherapy linear accelerator beams: Effect of ion chamber calibration and long-term stability.
Ravichandran R; Binukumar JP; Davis CA
J Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 38(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 24672156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015.
Muhammad W; Ullah A; Mahmood K; Matiullah
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016; 17(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 27538269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 50 Years of the IAEA/WHO postal dose audit programme for radiotherapy: what can we learn from 13756 results?
Izewska J; Bokulic T; Kazantsev P; Wesolowska P; van der Merwe D
Acta Oncol; 2020 May; 59(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 32036736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility study of glass dosimeter postal dosimetry audit of high-energy radiotherapy photon beams.
Mizuno H; Kanai T; Kusano Y; Ko S; Ono M; Fukumura A; Abe K; Nishizawa K; Shimbo M; Sakata S; Ishikura S; Ikeda H
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 18023489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of SSDL in quality assurance in radiotherapy.
Bulski W; Chełmiński K; Ulkowski P; Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W; Grabska I; Kukołowicz P
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2020; 25(6):902-905. PubMed ID: 32982598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetry quality audit of high energy photon beams in greek radiotherapy centers.
Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Apr; 87(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 18343514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validating dose rate calibration of radiotherapy photon beams through IAEA/WHO postal audit dosimetry service.
Jangda AQ; Hussein S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):490-3. PubMed ID: 22755316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The EQUAL-ESTRO external quality control laboratory in France].
Roué A; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; Svensson H
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Nov; 8 Suppl 1():S44-9. PubMed ID: 15679246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. IAEA TLD based audits for radiation protection calibrations at Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratories. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Pernicka F; Meghzifene A; Tölli H; Izewska J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):275-8. PubMed ID: 12382751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A thermoluminescent dosimetry postal dose inter-comparison of radiation therapy centres in Malaysia.
Rassiah P; Ng KH; DeWerd LA; Kunugi K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Mar; 27(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15156705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of in vivo thermoluminescent dosimeters in the quality assurance programme for the START breast fractionation trial.
Venables K; Miles EA; Aird EG; Hoskin PJ;
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jun; 71(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 15172146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of the IAEA standard holder on dose evaluated from TLD samples.
Izewska J; Novotny J; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 8778826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.
Soares C; Drupieski C; Wingert B; Pritchett G; Pagonis V; O'Brien M; Sliski A; Bilski P; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):78-82. PubMed ID: 16735571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The status of high-energy photon and electron beam dosimetry five years after the implementation of the IAEA Code of Practice in the Nordic countries.
Andreo P
Acta Oncol; 1993; 32(5):483-500. PubMed ID: 8217232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. IAEA/WHO postal dosimetry audit methodology for electron beams using radio photoluminescent dosimeters.
Dimitriadis A; Kazantsev P; Chelminski K; Titovich E; Naida E; Magnus T; Meghzifene A; Azangwe G; Carrara M; Swamidas J
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7214-7221. PubMed ID: 37793099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
