These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14597702)
1. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Hebets EA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Nov; 100(23):13390-5. PubMed ID: 14597702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider. Sentenská L; Scott C; Mouginot P; Andrade MCB Behav Ecol; 2022; 33(4):688-697. PubMed ID: 35812367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Size matters: Antagonistic effects of body size on courtship and digging in a wolf spider with non-traditional sex roles. Mardiné E; Peretti A; Albín A; Oviedo-Diego M; Aisenberg A Behav Processes; 2022 Jan; 194():104547. PubMed ID: 34822941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders. Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The complexities of female mate choice and male polymorphisms: Elucidating the role of genetics, age, and mate-choice copying. Fowler-Finn KD; Sullivan-Beckers L; Runck AM; Hebets EA Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):1015-1035. PubMed ID: 32256539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eavesdropping and signal matching in visual courtship displays of spiders. Clark DL; Roberts JA; Uetz GW Biol Lett; 2012 Jun; 8(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 22219390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Bonduriansky R Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Courtship raises male fertilization success through post-mating sexual selection in a spider. Schneider JM; Lesmono K Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Sep; 276(1670):3105-11. PubMed ID: 19515667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions. Gaskett AC Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Feb; 82(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 17313523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-copulatory choices drive post-copulatory decisions: mechanisms of female control shift across different life stages. Sentenská L; Scott CE; Baruffaldi L; Andrade MCB BMC Ecol Evol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):25. PubMed ID: 37370021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coy Males and Seductive Females in the Sexually Cannibalistic Colonial Spider, Cyrtophora citricola. Yip EC; Berner-Aharon N; Smith DR; Lubin Y PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155433. PubMed ID: 27249787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Probable Case of Incipient Speciation in Schizocosa Wolf Spiders Driven by Allochrony, Habitat Use, and Female Mate Choice. Gilman RT; Fowler-Finn K; Hebets EA Am Nat; 2018 Sep; 192(3):332-346. PubMed ID: 30125229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations. Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plasticity of the mate choice mind: courtship evokes choice-like brain responses in females from a coercive mating system. Wang SM; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME Genes Brain Behav; 2014 Apr; 13(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 24548673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Males of a sexually cannibalistic spider chemically assess relative female quality. Cory AL; Schneider JM BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):90. PubMed ID: 32703164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No pain, no gain: Male plasticity in burrow digging according to female rejection in a sand-dwelling wolf spider. Carballo M; Baldenegro F; Bollatti F; Peretti AV; Aisenberg A Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():174-180. PubMed ID: 28502868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted. Cross FR; Jackson RR Behav Processes; 2009 Feb; 80(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19041931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female's courtship threshold allows intruding males to mate with reduced effort. Stoltz JA; Andrade MC Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):585-92. PubMed ID: 19864292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male vulnerability explains the occurrence of sexual cannibalism in a moderately sexually dimorphic wolf spider. Fernández-Montraveta C; González JM; Cuadrado M Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():53-9. PubMed ID: 24631760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Jennions MD; Petrie M Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]