BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14597952)

  • 21. [Significance of diagnostic procedures in reflux esophagitis (author's transl)].
    Witte J
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1978 Nov; 347():279-83. PubMed ID: 732428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux diseases: No difference with regard to reflux pattern and motility abnormalities.
    Martínek J; Benes M; Hucl T; Drastich P; Stirand P; Spicák J
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 18584517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Esophageal intra-abdominal ultrasonographic in children with gastroesophageal reflux: correlation between endoscopic and histopathologic data].
    Antunes MM; Yamada RM; Trevisan M; Cardoso SR; Servidoni Mde F; Hessel G
    Arq Gastroenterol; 1998; 35(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 10347714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gastroesophageal reflux. A panel by correspondence.
    Arch Surg; 1974 Jan; 108(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 4808573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Esophageal motility in patients with sliding hiatal hernia with reflux esophagitis.
    Ye P; Li ZS; Xu GM; Zou DW; Xu XR; Lu RH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 May; 121(10):898-903. PubMed ID: 18706203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endoscopic, and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation.
    Nasi A; Filho JP; Zilberstein B; Cecconello I; Gama-Rodrigues JJ; Pinotti HW
    Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11422305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Esophageal and gastric acidity determination: its value and limitations].
    Baldi F; Longanesi A; Ferrarini F
    Minerva Chir; 1991 Apr; 46(7 Suppl):77-81. PubMed ID: 2067700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Esophageal mucosal sensitivity: possible links with clinical presentations in patients with erosive esophagitis and laryngopharyngeal reflux.
    Korkmaz M; Tarhan E; Unal H; Selcuk H; Yilmaz U; Ozluoglu L
    Dig Dis Sci; 2007 Feb; 52(2):451-6. PubMed ID: 17219066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gastric emptying in patients with severe reflux esophagitis.
    Keshavarzian A; Bushnell DL; Sontag S; Yegelwel EJ; Smid K
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Jun; 86(6):738-42. PubMed ID: 2038997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease].
    Koop H
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2004 Nov; 93(47):1959-62. PubMed ID: 15656006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Duodenogastric reflux and reflux esophagitis.
    Little AG; Martinez EI; DeMeester TR; Blough RM; Skinner DB
    Surgery; 1984 Aug; 96(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 6463873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of Barrett's esophagus on the clinical signs and postoperative results of GERD].
    Endzinas Z; Mickevicius A; Kiudelis M
    Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Apr; 129(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15106039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association of hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux: correlation between presence and size of hiatal hernia and 24-hour pH monitoring of the esophagus.
    Ott DJ; Glauser SJ; Ledbetter MS; Chen MY; Koufman JA; Gelfand DW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):557-9. PubMed ID: 7645469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The instrumental diagnosis of hiatal hernias].
    Talimov OV; Gantsev ShKh; Praznikov EN
    Lik Sprava; 1994 Feb; (2):70-3. PubMed ID: 8073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Impact of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring with 2 channels in the diagnosis of reflux-induced otolaryngologic disorders].
    Issing WJ; Tauber S; Folwaczny C; Reichel O
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 May; 82(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 12800080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and mild degree of esophagitis: comparison of symptoms endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric patterns.
    Grande M; Sileri P; Attinà GM; De Luca E; Ciano P; Ciangola CI; Cadeddu F
    World J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 10():84. PubMed ID: 22591510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can the combination of symptoms and endoscopy confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease?
    Tefera L; Fein M; Ritter MP; Bremner CG; Crookes PF; Peters JH; Hagen JA; DeMeester TR
    Am Surg; 1997 Oct; 63(10):933-6. PubMed ID: 9322676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disease characteristics in non-erosive reflux disease with and without endoscopically minimal change esophagitis: are they different?
    Lei WY; Liu TT; Yi CH; Chen CL
    Digestion; 2012; 85(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 22156539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The value of continuous pH determination, manometry, esophagoscopy and roentgenologic examination in gastroesophageal reflux and esophagitis in young children].
    den Ouden WJ; Sinaasappel M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Jun; 127(24):1037-41. PubMed ID: 6877406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Reflux esophagitis: manometry and Ph measurement].
    Eberl T; Wienbeck M; Barnert J
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1996 Nov; 85(45):1428-31. PubMed ID: 8975351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.