464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14598025)
1. Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.
Prevrhal S; Meta M; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Jan; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 14598025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new trabecular region of interest for femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry: short-term precision, age-related bone loss, and fracture discrimination compared with current femoral regions of interest.
Takada M; Grampp S; Ouyang X; Engelke K; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):832-8. PubMed ID: 9144350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C; Lisi L; Fini M; Giardino R; Giavaresi G
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 11878458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in men.
Legrand E; Chappard D; Pascaretti C; Duquenne M; Rondeau C; Simon Y; Rohmer V; Basle MF; Audran M
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 10692973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How hip and whole-body bone mineral density predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study.
Schott AM; Cormier C; Hans D; Favier F; Hausherr E; Dargent-Molina P; Delmas PD; Ribot C; Sebert JL; Breart G; Meunier PJ
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 9797909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spine and femur BMD by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis.
Ryan PJ; Blake GM; Herd R; Parker J; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Apr; 52(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8467405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.
Ardawi MS; Maimany AA; Bahksh TM; Nasrat HA; Milaat WA; Al-Raddadi RM
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15167986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DXA Measured Distal Femur Bone Mineral Density in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Method Development and Reproducibility.
Thomas B; Binkley N; Anderson PA; Krueger D
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 30228047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.
Pulkkinen P; Partanen J; Jalovaara P; Jämsä T
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 14760516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry.
Luo Y
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jun; 29(6):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 29508039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in chinese women.
Liao EY; Wu XP; Deng XG; Huang G; Zhu XP; Long ZF; Wang WB; Tang WL; Zhang H
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Aug; 13(8):669-76. PubMed ID: 12181627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine: a case-control study.
López Picazo M; Humbert L; Winzenrieth R; Di Gregorio S; González Ballester MA; Del Río Barquero LM
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 31897775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefit of hormone replacement therapy on bone mass is greater at the vertebral body than posterior processes or proximal femur.
Duan Y; Tabensky A; DeLuca V; Seeman E
Bone; 1997 Nov; 21(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 9356739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study.
Chesnut CH; Majumdar S; Newitt DC; Shields A; Van Pelt J; Laschansky E; Azria M; Kriegman A; Olson M; Eriksen EF; Mindeholm L
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1548-61. PubMed ID: 16059627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.
Blaty T; Krueger D; Illgen R; Squire M; Heiderscheit B; Binkley N; Anderson P
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 30171301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Premenopausal and postmenopausal changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Ravn P; Hetland ML; Overgaard K; Christiansen C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1975-80. PubMed ID: 7872064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study.
Clowes JA; Eastell R; Peel NF
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1794-802. PubMed ID: 15947861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
