These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14598029)

  • 1. Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients.
    Schellongowski P; Benesch M; Lang T; Traunmüller F; Zauner C; Laczika K; Locker GJ; Frass M; Staudinger T
    Intensive Care Med; 2004 Mar; 30(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 14598029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit.
    Sculier JP; Paesmans M; Markiewicz E; Berghmans T
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2786-92. PubMed ID: 10966251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.
    Xing X; Gao Y; Wang H; Huang C; Qu S; Zhang H; Wang H; Sun K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?
    Berghmans T; Paesmans M; Sculier JP
    Support Care Cancer; 2004 Apr; 12(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 14740281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients.
    Siddiqui SS; Narkhede AM; Kulkarni AP; Prabu NR; Chaudhari HK; Sarode SV; Divatia JV
    Indian J Crit Care Med; 2020 Apr; 24(4):263-269. PubMed ID: 32565637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.
    Castella X; Artigas A; Bion J; Kari A
    Crit Care Med; 1995 Aug; 23(8):1327-35. PubMed ID: 7634802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.
    Lee JH; Hwang SY; Kim HR; Kim YW; Kang MJ; Cho KW; Lee DW; Kim YH
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2017 May; 36(5):431-437. PubMed ID: 27387349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.
    Gupta R; Arora VK
    Indian J Med Res; 2004 Jun; 119(6):273-82. PubMed ID: 15243165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study.
    Soares M; Silva UV; Teles JM; Silva E; Caruso P; Lobo SM; Dal Pizzol F; Azevedo LP; de Carvalho FB; Salluh JI
    Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1188-95. PubMed ID: 20221751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of three prognostic models in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective study.
    Martos-Benítez FD; Larrondo-Muguercia H; León-Pérez D; Rivero-López JC; Orama-Requejo V; Martínez-Alfonso JL
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 25(7):1242-1249. PubMed ID: 32212014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units.
    Khwannimit B; Geater A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):643-52. PubMed ID: 17487117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit.
    Sakr Y; Krauss C; Amaral AC; Réa-Neto A; Specht M; Reinhart K; Marx G
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 18845649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].
    Kim EK; Kwon YD; Hwang JH
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2005 Aug; 38(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16323627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of mortality by using the standard scoring systems in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand.
    Ratanarat R; Thanakittiwirun M; Vilaichone W; Thongyoo S; Permpikul C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jul; 88(7):949-55. PubMed ID: 16241025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simplified prognostic model for critically ill patients in resource limited settings in South Asia.
    Haniffa R; Mukaka M; Munasinghe SB; De Silva AP; Jayasinghe KSA; Beane A; de Keizer N; Dondorp AM
    Crit Care; 2017 Oct; 21(1):250. PubMed ID: 29041985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.
    Arabi Y; Al Shirawi N; Memish Z; Venkatesh S; Al-Shimemeri A
    Crit Care; 2003 Oct; 7(5):R116-22. PubMed ID: 12974979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplified acute physiology score II/acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and prediction of the mortality and later development of complications in poisoned patients admitted to intensive care unit.
    Alizadeh AM; Hassanian-Moghaddam H; Shadnia S; Zamani N; Mehrpour O
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 115(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 24517530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scoring system in predicting mortality and length of stay at surgical intensive care unit.
    Gilani MT; Razavi M; Azad AM
    Niger Med J; 2014 Mar; 55(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 24791049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India.
    Aggarwal AN; Sarkar P; Gupta D; Jindal SK
    Respirology; 2006 Mar; 11(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16548906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.
    Costa e Silva VT; de Castro I; Liaño F; Muriel A; Rodríguez-Palomares JR; Yu L
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3894-901. PubMed ID: 21505093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.