These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14598425)
1. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer. Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Brown G; Radcliffe AG; Newcombe RG; Dallimore NS; Bourne MW; Williams GT Br J Surg; 2003 Mar; 90(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 12594673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma? Khani MH; Smedh K; Kraaz W Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 17535279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis: A multicentric phase II study. Valentini V; Morganti AG; Gambacorta MA; Mohiuddin M; Doglietto GB; Coco C; De Paoli A; Rossi C; Di Russo A; Valvo F; Bolzicco G; Dalla Palma M; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(4):1129-39. PubMed ID: 16414206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status. Kulkarni T; Gollins S; Maw A; Hobson P; Byrne R; Widdowson D Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-89. PubMed ID: 18318754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran BJ; Blomqvist L; Swift IR; Sebag-Montefiore D; Tekkis P; Brown G; J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24276776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer]. Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language. Glynne-Jones R; Mawdsley S; Novell JR Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17032329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin - a root cause analysis. Youssef H; Collantes EC; Rashid SH; Wong LS; Baragwanath P Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jun; 11(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 18637930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit. Videhult P; Smedh K; Lundin P; Kraaz W Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 17504337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery. Hermanek P; Junginger T Tech Coloproctol; 2005 Dec; 9(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 16328130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison study for predicting circumferential resection margin between preoperative MRI and whole mount sections in mid-rectal cancer: significance of different scan planes. Kim YW; Kim NK; Min BS; Kim H; Pyo J; Kim MJ; Cha SH Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 17574368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision. Lee SH; Hernandez de Anda E; Finne CO; Madoff RD; Garcia-Aguilar J Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2249-57. PubMed ID: 16400512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Gosens MJ; Klaassen RA; Tan-Go I; Rutten HJ; Martijn H; van den Brule AJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van Krieken JH; Nagtegaal ID Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 13(22 Pt 1):6617-23. PubMed ID: 18006762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One millimetre is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer. Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran B; Blomqvist L; Swift I; St Rose S; Sebag-Montefiore DJ; Tekkis P; Brown G; Br J Surg; 2011 Jun; 98(6):872-9. PubMed ID: 21480194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial. den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D; Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgery for recurrent rectal carcinoma: The role of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Messiou C; Chalmers A; Boyle K; Sagar P Clin Radiol; 2006 Mar; 61(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 16488206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]