These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459891)

  • 1. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Harris JJ; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Williams FL; Wise JW; Cross HR; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2000 May; 78(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 10834579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
    Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Live and carcass values from different cattle types.
    Mies WL; Harris JJ; Knapp RH; Edwards JW; Terry CA; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 May; 70(5):1314-25. PubMed ID: 1526899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
    Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
    Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
    Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
    Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
    Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting carcass composition of beef cattle using ultrasound technology.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Recio HA; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 10328353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
    Pringle TD; Williams SE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
    Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1736-42. PubMed ID: 12854810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
    Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 12643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe to predict yields of lamb carcasses fabricated to multiple end points.
    Garrett RP; Edwards JW; Savell JW; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 1582945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.