These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459893)

  • 1. Animal model for genetic evaluation of multibreed data.
    Arnold JW; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3322-32. PubMed ID: 1459893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Covariance components and prediction for additive and nonadditive preweaning growth genetic effects in an Angus-Brahman multibreed herd.
    Elzo MA; Wakeman DL
    J Anim Sci; 1998 May; 76(5):1290-302. PubMed ID: 9621935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of test-day model (co)variance components across breeds using New Zealand dairy cattle data.
    Vanderick S; Harris BL; Pryce JE; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):1240-52. PubMed ID: 19233817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Covariances among sire by breed group of dam interaction effects in multibreed sire evaluation procedures.
    Elzo MA
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4079-99. PubMed ID: 2286550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Wiggans GR; Megonigal JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2434-41. PubMed ID: 17430948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds.
    Roso VM; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16024696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restricted maximum likelihood procedures for the estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances and covariances in multibreed populations.
    Elzo MA
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Dec; 72(12):3055-65. PubMed ID: 7759353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk yield, fertility, and lifetime performance traits of dairy cattle.
    Fuerst C; Sölkner J
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1114-25. PubMed ID: 8201046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Cooper JB; Phelps MI; Mosholder AL
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jul; 90(7):3542-9. PubMed ID: 17582138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Across-country test-day model evaluations for Holstein, Nordic Red Cattle, and Jersey.
    Lidauer MH; Pösö J; Pedersen J; Lassen J; Madsen P; Mäntysaari EA; Nielsen US; Eriksson JÅ; Johansson K; Pitkänen T; Strandén I; Aamand GP
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):1296-309. PubMed ID: 25434332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.
    Williams JL; Aguilar I; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):460-6. PubMed ID: 19820043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should genetic groups be fitted in BLUP evaluation? Practical answer for the French AI beef sire evaluation.
    Phocas F; Laloë D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(3):325-45. PubMed ID: 15107269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic parameters and trends in the Chilean multibreed dairy cattle population.
    Elzo MA; Jara A; Barria N
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1506-18. PubMed ID: 15291000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multibreed genetic evaluation in bovines using simulated data employing a composite population.
    Bocchi AL; Oliveira HN; Ferraz JB; Eler JP
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Oct; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27808355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic evaluation of calving ease for Brown Swiss and Jersey bulls from purebred and crossbred calvings.
    Cole JB; Goodling RC; Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1529-39. PubMed ID: 15778323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between sire-maternal grandsire and animal models for genetic evaluation of longevity in a dairy cattle population with small herds.
    Jenko J; Gorjanc G; Kovač M; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):8002-13. PubMed ID: 24124654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct genetic, maternal genetic, and heterozygosity effects on weaning weight in a Colombian multibreed beef cattle population.
    Vergara OD; Ceron-Muñoz MF; Arboleda EM; Orozco Y; Ossa GA
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 18952738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.