These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459893)

  • 21. Correlations between purebred and crossbred body weight traits in Limousin and Limousin-Angus populations.
    Lukaszewicz M; Davis R; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1490-3. PubMed ID: 26020170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproductive performance of crossline and pureline dairy heifers.
    Lin CY; McAllister AJ; Batra TR; Lee AJ; Roy GL; Vesely JA; Wauthy JM; Winter KA
    J Dairy Sci; 1984 Oct; 67(10):2420-8. PubMed ID: 6501653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
    Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breed group effects on milk production of Brazilian crossbred dairy cows.
    Freitas AF; Wilcox CJ; Costa CN
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Aug; 81(8):2306-11. PubMed ID: 9749398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parsimonious model for analyzing parent-of-origin effects related to beef traits in dual-purpose Simmental.
    Blunk I; Mayer M; Hamann H; Reinsch N
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Feb; 95(2):559-571. PubMed ID: 28380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relevance of purebred information for predicting genetic merit of survival at birth of crossbred piglets.
    Cecchinato A; de los Campos G; Gianola D; Gallo L; Carnier P
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 19897636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2286-302. PubMed ID: 12350006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic parameters for a maternal breeding goal in beef production.
    Roughsedge T; Amer PR; Thompson R; Simm G
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2319-29. PubMed ID: 16160043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short communication: genetic evaluation of stillbirth in US Brown Swiss and Jersey cattle.
    Yao C; Weigel KA; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(4):2474-80. PubMed ID: 24508434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Equivalence of multibreed animal models and hierarchical Bayes analysis for maternally influenced traits.
    Leguizamón SM; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jun; 42(1):20. PubMed ID: 20540758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of the Canadian beef reference herd for gene mapping studies.
    Schmutz SM; Buchanan FC; Winkelman-Sim DC; Pawlyshyn V; Plante Y; McKinnon JJ; Fournier BP
    Theriogenology; 2001 Mar; 55(4):963-72. PubMed ID: 11291918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct and maternal genetic effects for carcass traits in beef cattle.
    DeRouen SM; Franke DE; Bidner TD; Blouin DC
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Dec; 70(12):3677-85. PubMed ID: 1474007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic evaluation of Holstein sires and maternal grandsires in the United States for perinatal survival.
    Meyer CL; Berger PJ; Thompson JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 May; 84(5):1246-54. PubMed ID: 11384052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of birth and weaning traits of Romosinuano calves as purebreds and crosses with Brahman and Angus.
    Riley DG; Chase CC; Coleman SW; Olson TA
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 17235015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Additive and nonadditive genetic effects on milk production in dairy cattle: evidence for major individual heterosis.
    Ahlborn-Breier G; Hohenboken WD
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):592-602. PubMed ID: 2045565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.
    Akanno EC; Abo-Ismail MK; Chen L; Crowley JJ; Wang Z; Li C; Basarab JA; MacNeil MD; Plastow GS
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 29373745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Study on BLUP with reduced animal model in evaluation of performance tested males].
    Gong BY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 2629910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stillbirth (co)variance components for a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model and development of a calving ability index for sire selection.
    Cole JB; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Miller RH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2489-96. PubMed ID: 17430953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.