149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459930)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue tumors.
De Schepper AM; Ramon FA; Degryse HR
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Aug; 75(4):286-96. PubMed ID: 1459930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical analysis of MRI parameters predicting malignancy in 141 soft tissue masses.
De Schepper AM; Ramon FA; Degryse HR
Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 1617181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue masses by magnetic resonance imaging: role of tissue component analysis.
Chen CK; Wu HT; Chiou HJ; Wei CJ; Yen CH; Chang CY; Chen WM
J Chin Med Assoc; 2009 Apr; 72(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 19372075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Correlation of MRI features to histopathologic grade of soft tissue sarcoma].
Liu QY; Li HG; Chen JY; Liang BL
Ai Zheng; 2008 Aug; 27(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 18710621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma: can MRI help discriminating from other soft-tissue tumors? A study of the French sarcoma group.
Crombé A; Brisse HJ; Ledoux P; Haddag-Miliani L; Bouhamama A; Taieb S; Le Loarer F; Kind M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3170-3182. PubMed ID: 30560359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma: assessment with MR imaging.
Elias DA; White LM; Simpson DJ; Kandel RA; Tomlinson G; Bell RS; Wunder JS
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 14519874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of the musculoskeletal soft tissue mass: is heterogeneity a sign of malignancy?
Pang KK; Hughes T
J Chin Med Assoc; 2003 Nov; 66(11):655-61. PubMed ID: 14768852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of MR findings in predicting the nature of the soft tissue lesions: benign, malignant or undetermined lesion?
Soler R; Castro JM; Rodríguez E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1996; 20(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8930469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Imaging manifestations and pathologic features of soft tissue desmoid-type fibromatosis].
Liu QY; Chen JY; Liang BL; Li HG; Gao M; Lin XF
Ai Zheng; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1287-92. PubMed ID: 19079995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors.
Van Herendael BH; Heyman SR; Vanhoenacker FM; De Temmerman G; Bloem JL; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Skeletal Radiol; 2006 Oct; 35(10):745-53. PubMed ID: 16775712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI of soft-tissue tumors: fast STIR sequence as substitute for T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequence.
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Matsunaga N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1607-14. PubMed ID: 19933655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A comparative study between magnetic resonance imaging and histological findings of bone and soft tissue tumors].
Itoh K
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Oct; 69(10):899-914. PubMed ID: 8551093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy.
van Rijswijk CS; Geirnaerdt MJ; Hogendoorn PC; Taminiau AH; van Coevorden F; Zwinderman AH; Pope TL; Bloem JL
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):493-502. PubMed ID: 15459325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients.
Gielen JL; De Schepper AM; Vanhoenacker F; Parizel PM; Wang XL; Sciot R; Weyler J
Eur Radiol; 2004 Dec; 14(12):2320-30. PubMed ID: 15290067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign and malignant soft tissue mass: magnetic resonance imaging criteria for discrimination.
Kalayanarooj S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jan; 91(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 18386548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Staging and re-staging of soft tissue sarcoma using MRI. Usefulness of contrast media].
Barile A; Caulo M; Zugaro L; Di Cesare E; Gallucci M; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):444-55. PubMed ID: 11479441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI of soft-tissue masses: the relationship between lesion size, depth, and diagnosis.
Datir A; James SL; Ali K; Lee J; Ahmad M; Saifuddin A
Clin Radiol; 2008 Apr; 63(4):373-8; discussion 379-80. PubMed ID: 18325355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions.
Moulton JS; Blebea JS; Dunco DM; Braley SE; Bisset GS; Emery KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 7717231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
