These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 146000)

  • 1. [The diagnostic value of mammography during pregnancy and lactation (the radiological features of the breast during pregnancy) (author's transl)].
    Gregl A; Flaskamp D; Haller J; Heitmann D; Hofmann P; Krack U; Scholz GW
    Rofo; 1977 Dec; 127(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 146000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast disease. A clinical study with special reference to diagnostic procedures.
    Johnsén C
    Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1975; 454():1-108. PubMed ID: 1059305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal and perinatal correlates of adult mammographic breast density.
    Cerhan JR; Sellers TA; Janney CA; Pankratz VS; Brandt KR; Vachon CM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1502-8. PubMed ID: 15941963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and lactation: biological features and treatment options.
    Gentilini O; Masullo M; Rotmensz N; Peccatori F; Mazzarol G; Smeets A; Simsek S; De Dosso S; Veronesi P; Intra M; Zurrida S; Viale G; Goldhirsch A; Veronesi U
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Apr; 31(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 15780556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Previous pregnancy outcome and breast density (United States).
    El-Bastawissi AY; Aiello EJ; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 May; 16(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 15953983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The abnormal mammogram in women with clinically normal breasts.
    Sterns EE
    Can J Surg; 1995 Apr; 38(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 7728672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Onset and evolution of stunting in infants and children. Examples from the Human Nutrition Collaborative Research Support Program. Kenya and Egypt studies.
    Neumann CG; Harrison GG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Feb; 48 Suppl 1():S90-102. PubMed ID: 8005095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ultrasonic mammography: its importance in integrated diagnosis of breast diseases (author's transl)].
    Thiel C; Schweikhart G
    Rofo; 1982 Jul; 137(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 6286434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography of symptomatic breasts. A report on 1119 consecutive patients.
    Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Svinhufvud U
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1980; 69(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 7377735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Lactation after the implantation of a gel-prothesis into hypoplastic breasts (author's transl)].
    Kubácek V; Martincík J; Krenar J
    Cesk Gynekol; 1975 Sep; 40(8):606-8. PubMed ID: 1238175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ultrasound mammography:special applications (author's transl)].
    Eulenburg R; Hackelöer BJ; Lauth G; Hüneke B; Duda V; Buchholz R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Mar; 41(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 7215754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rationale for a diagnostic chain in gestational breast tumor diagnosis.
    Bock K; Hadji P; Ramaswamy A; Schmidt S; Duda VF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 273(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 16311748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy and lactation in relation to breast cancer risk.
    Vorherr H
    Semin Perinatol; 1979 Jul; 3(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 392771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of lightscanning and mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Jarlman O; Andersson I; Balldin G; Larsson SA
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Jan; 33(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 1731847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
    Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic appearance of the breasts during pregnancy and lactation: false assumptions.
    Swinford AE; Adler DD; Garver KA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Jul; 5(7):467-72. PubMed ID: 9653462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.