These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14600331)

  • 1. Comparison of a simulated versus work environment lifting task on L5/S1 compression forces.
    Surrey LR; Fineran B; Howerton B; Mock A; Naylor D; Wiegand-Swihart T
    Work; 2003; 21(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 14600331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loads on the lumbar spine during a work capacity assessment test.
    Cole MH; Grimshaw PN; Burden AM
    Work; 2004; 23(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 15502297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts.
    Alderson J; Hopper L; Elliott B; Ackland T
    J Dance Med Sci; 2009; 13(3):83-9. PubMed ID: 19754984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting.
    Gagnon M; Smyth G
    Ergonomics; 1992 Mar; 35(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 1572341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jan; 54(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 21181590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Chang SY
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 20116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing polynomial and cubic spline interpolation of segment angles for estimating L5/S1 net moment during symmetric lifting tasks.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 19880119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating 3-D L5/S1 moments during manual lifting using a video coding system: validity and interrater reliability.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1053-65. PubMed ID: 23397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of fatigue failure responses of old versus middle-aged lumbar motion segments in simulated flexed lifting.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D; Landoll J; Matkovic V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1832-9. PubMed ID: 17762290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in lifting strategies during a repetitive palletizing task.
    Plamondon A; Larivière C; Denis D; St-Vincent M; Delisle A;
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1558-69. PubMed ID: 24931477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.