BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14601014)

  • 1. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
    Parker CB; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting the generalized ROC curve for covariates.
    Schisterman EF; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(21):3319-31. PubMed ID: 15490426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
    Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
    Hand DJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part I: The use of ROC curves in diagnostic medicine and electrocardiographic markers of ischaemia.
    Barnabei L; Marazìa S; De Caterina R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Nov; 8(11):873-81. PubMed ID: 17906471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Practical application of receiver operating characteristic curve on laboratory diagnosis].
    Matsuo S; Takahashi H
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 8051801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
    Wang Z; Chang YC
    Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
    Van Meerhaeghe A
    Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero.
    Schisterman EF; Reiser B; Faraggi D
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 16345033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.