These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14601140)

  • 1. Accuracy and applications of group MEG studies using cortical source locations estimated from participants' scalp surfaces.
    Holliday IE; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Singh KD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2003 Nov; 20(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 14601140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similarities between simulated spatial spectra of scalp EEG, MEG and structural MRI.
    Ramon C; Freeman WJ; Holmes M; Ishimaru A; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH; Rezvanian E
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19557510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sharing individualised template MRI data for MEG source reconstruction: A solution for open data while keeping subject confidentiality.
    Vinding MC; Oostenveld R
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 254():119165. PubMed ID: 35378289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical locations of maximal spindle activity: magnetoencephalography (MEG) study.
    Gumenyuk V; Roth T; Moran JE; Jefferson C; Bowyer SM; Tepley N; Drake CL
    J Sleep Res; 2009 Jun; 18(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 19645968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.
    Liljeström M; Stevenson C; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():75-87. PubMed ID: 26169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3-D human MRI using mathematical morphology.
    Dogdas B; Shattuck DW; Leahy RM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15966000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information spreading by a combination of MEG source estimation and multivariate pattern classification.
    Sato M; Yamashita O; Sato MA; Miyawaki Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198806. PubMed ID: 29912968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    George JS; Aine CJ; Mosher JC; Schmidt DM; Ranken DM; Schlitt HA; Wood CC; Lewine JD; Sanders JA; Belliveau JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):406-31. PubMed ID: 8576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jul; 16(3 Pt 1):638-50. PubMed ID: 12169249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An fMRI-constrained MEG source analysis with procedures for dividing and grouping activation.
    Fujimaki N; Hayakawa T; Nielsen M; Knösche TR; Miyauchi S
    Neuroimage; 2002 Sep; 17(1):324-43. PubMed ID: 12482087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of automated and manual co-registration for magnetoencephalography.
    Houck JM; Claus ED
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232100. PubMed ID: 32348350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consistency of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity and network reconstruction using a template versus native MRI for co-registration.
    Douw L; Nieboer D; Stam CJ; Tewarie P; Hillebrand A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Jan; 39(1):104-119. PubMed ID: 28990264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted reinforcement of neural oscillatory activity with real-time neuroimaging feedback.
    Florin E; Bock E; Baillet S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Mar; 88():54-60. PubMed ID: 24211817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-registration Comparison of On-Scalp Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Cao F; An N; Xu W; Wang W; Yang Y; Xiang M; Gao Y; Ning X
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():706785. PubMed ID: 34483827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of routine MR imaging of the brain at 1.5 T on subsequent magnetoencephalography: results in nine volunteers.
    Fitzek C; Haueisen J; Huonker R; Reichenbach JR; Pfleiderer SO; Mentzel HJ; Sauner D; Brandl U; Kaiser WA
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):715-9. PubMed ID: 14749513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling the magnetic signature of neuronal tissue.
    Blagoev KB; Mihaila B; Travis BJ; Alexandrov LB; Bishop AR; Ranken D; Posse S; Gasparovic C; Mayer A; Aine CJ; Ulbert I; Morita M; Müller W; Connor J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic source imaging (MSI).
    Wheless JW; Castillo E; Maggio V; Kim HL; Breier JI; Simos PG; Papanicolaou AC
    Neurologist; 2004 May; 10(3):138-53. PubMed ID: 15140274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.