91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1460202)
1. Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices.
Engler DB; DeJarnatt AC; Sim TC; Lee JL; Grant JA
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):985-91. PubMed ID: 1460202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of 4 skin prick tests to detect immediate hypersensitivity].
Ortega Cisneros M; Ramos García BC; del Río Navarro BE; Sienra Monge JJ
Rev Alerg Mex; 1998; 45(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 9650494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reproducibility of multi-test skin test device.
Mahan C; Spectror S; Siegel S; Rachelefsky G; Katz R; Rohr A
Ann Allergy; 1993 Jul; 71(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8328708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
Corder WT; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Multi-Test device for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
Berkowitz RB; Tinkelman DG; Lutz C; Crummie A; Smith K
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):979-85. PubMed ID: 1460201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of fexofenadine versus desloratadine in suppressing histamine-induced wheal and flare.
Meltzer EO; Gillman SA
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17390761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lack of subsensitivity to terfenadine during long-term terfenadine treatment.
Simons FE; Watson WT; Simons KJ
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1988 Dec; 82(6):1068-75. PubMed ID: 2904930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Quintest to the lancet in allergic skin testing.
Carrozzi FM; Byth K; Katelaris CH
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 1998 Dec; 16(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 10219895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative potency of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo using a skin test model of wheal-and-flare suppression.
Kaliner MA; White MV; Economides A; Crisalida T; Hale M; Liao Y; Christian CD; Georges GC; Woodworth TH; Meeves SG
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Jun; 90(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 12839321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
