These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1460217)

  • 21. The Mammography Quality Standards Act and interventional mammography procedures.
    Houn F; Finder C
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 82(3):14-7. PubMed ID: 10166189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. FDA's mammography facility quality assurance program.
    Kivel M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Feb; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 10132931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammography quality assurance programs.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):239-43. PubMed ID: 8004593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammography accreditation and equipment performance.
    Barnes GT; Hendrick RE
    Radiographics; 1994 Jan; 14(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 8128045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MQSA helps eliminate inferior mammography.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Nov; 19(11):129-32, 136. PubMed ID: 10176114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality assurance in mammography: status of residency education.
    Bassett LW; Lubisich JP; Bresch JP; Jessop NW; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Feb; 160(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 8424332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
    Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
    Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Plans of the German Roentgen Society and the Professional Association for Quality Assurance in Mammography].
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 11388056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality of care and performance improvement.
    McLelland R
    N C Med J; 2005; 66(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 15786688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of acceptability criteria in mammography.
    Faulkner K; Malone JF; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 23169814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short communication: A printed image quality test phantom for mammography.
    Kotre CJ; Porter DJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 78(932):746-8. PubMed ID: 16046428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance.
    Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems].
    Stines J
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.