These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14602286)

  • 1. Are mechanical valves with enhanced inner diameter advantageous in the small sized aortic annulus?
    Albes JM; Hartrumpf M; Rudolph V; Krempl T; Hüttemann E; Vollandt R; Wahlers T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Nov; 76(5):1564-70; discussion 1570. PubMed ID: 14602286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valve by continuous-wave Doppler and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Sezai A; Kasamaki Y; Abe K; Hata M; Sekino H; Shimura K; Minami K
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 89(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 20103211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Okamura H; Yamaguchi A; Tanaka M; Naito K; Kimura N; Kimura C; Kobinata T; Ino T; Adachi H
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 87(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 19101276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early in vivo hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Gelsomino S; Morocutti G; Da Col P; Masullo G; Carella R; Guzzi G; Spedicato L; Livi U
    J Card Surg; 2003; 18(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 12757339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of On-X and SJM HP bileaflet aortic valves.
    Walther T; Falk V; Tigges R; Krüger M; Langebartels G; Diegeler A; Autschbach R; Mohr FW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):403-7. PubMed ID: 10888098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replacement of the st jude medical regent valve in the aortic position with a continuous suture technique in the small aortic root.
    Wu Z; Cao H; Zhu D; Wang Q; Wang D
    J Card Surg; 2014 Mar; 29(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 24131494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of St. Jude medical valve in patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus on cardiac function and late survival result.
    Natsuaki M; Itoh T; Okazaki Y; Takarabe K; Furukawa K; Rikitake K; Ohtubo S
    Artif Organs; 2002 Oct; 26(10):840-6. PubMed ID: 12296922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
    Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of Regent mechanical valve in patients with small aortic annulus: 3-year follow-up.
    Zhao D; Wang C; Hong T; Pan C; Guo C
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 7():88. PubMed ID: 22999490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude medical valve in Japanese patients.
    Yoshikawa K; Fukunaga S; Arinaga K; Hori H; Nakamura E; Ueda T; Tayama E; Aoyagi S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18355515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?
    Suri RM; Michelena HI; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Sundt TM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1387-95, 1398; discussion 1395-7. PubMed ID: 23140964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
    Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
    Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic performance of Trifecta: single-center experience of 400 patients.
    Modi A; Budra M; Miskolczi S; Velissaris T; Kaarne M; Barlow CW; Livesey SA; Ohri SK; Tsang GM
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Feb; 23(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 24823382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal results of aortic valve replacement with small mechanical valves (< 19 mm).
    Kato Y; Hattori K; Motoki M; Takahashi Y; Kotani S; Nishimura S; Shibata T
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24224408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trifecta has lower gradient and less prosthesis-patient mismatch than Mosaic Ultra in the aortic position: A prospective randomized study.
    Braathen B; Husebye T; Lunde IG; Tønnessen T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 158(4):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30635187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Günzinger R; Kemkes BM; Bleese N; Sosnowski A; Maïza D; Coto EO; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):529-36; discussion 536. PubMed ID: 12150302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience.
    Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Thiene G; Nesseris G; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 127(6):1616-23. PubMed ID: 15173715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.