BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14603144)

  • 1. Patient selection criteria for liver transplantation.
    Yu AS; Keeffe EB
    Minerva Chir; 2003 Oct; 58(5):635-48. PubMed ID: 14603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regionwide sharing for status 1 liver patients--beneficial impact on waiting time and pre- and posttransplant survival.
    Humar A; Khwaja K; Glessing B; Larson E; Asolati M; Durand B; Lake J; Payne WD
    Liver Transpl; 2004 May; 10(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 15108258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.
    Schaffer RL; Kulkarni S; Harper A; Millis JM; Cronin DC
    Liver Transpl; 2003 Nov; 9(11):1211-5. PubMed ID: 14586883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient selection in an era of donor liver shortage: current US policy.
    Wiesner RH
    Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 16265097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a continuous disease severity score to the OPTN liver waiting list.
    Edwards EB; Harper AM
    Clin Transpl; 2001; ():19-24. PubMed ID: 12211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.
    Sharma P; Balan V; Hernandez JL; Harper AM; Edwards EB; Rodriguez-Luna H; Byrne T; Vargas HE; Mulligan D; Rakela J; Wiesner RH
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Jan; 10(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14755775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in United States veterans.
    Ahmad J; Downey KK; Akoad M; Cacciarelli TV
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Nov; 13(11):1564-9. PubMed ID: 17969210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new priority policy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation within the model for end-stage liver disease system.
    Piscaglia F; Camaggi V; Ravaioli M; Grazi GL; Zanello M; Leoni S; Ballardini G; Cavrini G; Pinna AD; Bolondi L
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Jun; 13(6):857-66. PubMed ID: 17539006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.
    Santori G; Andorno E; Morelli N; Casaccia M; Bottino G; Ghirelli R; Valente U
    Transplant Proc; 2008; 40(6):1903-5. PubMed ID: 18675084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National and regional analysis of exceptions to the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scoring system (2003-2004).
    Shneider BL; Suchy FJ; Emre S
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Jan; 12(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16382460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ allocation for liver-intestine candidates.
    Horslen S
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S86-9. PubMed ID: 15382223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overview of the MELD score and the UNOS adult liver allocation system.
    Martin AP; Bartels M; Hauss J; Fangmann J
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3169-74. PubMed ID: 18089345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Update on liver transplantation: indications, organ allocation, and long-term care.
    Lopez PM; Martin P
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 Dec; 73(8):1056-66. PubMed ID: 17285195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MELD-based liver allocation: who is underserved?
    Biggins SW; Bambha K
    Semin Liver Dis; 2006 Aug; 26(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 16850370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liver transplantation: evolving patient selection criteria.
    Yu AS; Ahmed A; Keeffe EB
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 15(11):729-38. PubMed ID: 11727003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates].
    Colmenero J; Castro-Narro G; Navasa M
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 19631411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liver transplant recipient selection: MELD vs. clinical judgment.
    Fink MA; Angus PW; Gow PJ; Berry SR; Wang BZ; Muralidharan V; Christophi C; Jones RM
    Liver Transpl; 2005 Jun; 11(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 15915491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocation priority in non-urgent liver transplantation: An overview of proposed scoring systems.
    Gitto S; Lorenzini S; Biselli M; Conti F; Andreone P; Bernardi M
    Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):700-6. PubMed ID: 19502118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.
    Barone M; Avolio AW; Di Leo A; Burra P; Francavilla A
    Transplantation; 2008 Mar; 85(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 18360266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) valid in Israel? A critical analysis of liver transplant waiting list mortality.
    Ben-Haim M; Carmiel M; Katz P; Shabtai E; Oren R; Nakache R
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Sep; 8(9):605-9. PubMed ID: 17058408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.