345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14603539)
1. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.
Pandharipande PV; Choy G; del Carmen MG; Gazelle GS; Russell AH; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):802-14. PubMed ID: 19234280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node diagnosis in oncologic imaging: a dilemma still waiting to be solved.
Golder WA
Onkologie; 2004 Apr; 27(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 15138355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Di Legge A; De Blasis I; Moruzzi MC; Bonatti M; Collarino A; Rufini V; Manfredi R
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):741-68. PubMed ID: 24861248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of dual-phase 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical cancer.
Yen TC; Ng KK; Ma SY; Chou HH; Tsai CS; Hsueh S; Chang TC; Hong JH; See LC; Lin WJ; Chen JT; Huang KG; Lui KW; Lai CH
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 21(19):3651-8. PubMed ID: 14512397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma.
Goldberg Y; Siegler Y; Segev Y; Mandel R; Siegler E; Auslander R; Lavie O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):312-316. PubMed ID: 31628851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restaging of recurrent cervical carcinoma with dual-phase [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography.
Lai CH; Huang KG; See LC; Yen TC; Tsai CS; Chang TC; Chou HH; Ng KK; Hsueh S; Hong JH
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 14745871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary report of using FDG-PET to detect extrapelvic lesions in cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph nodes on MRI/CT.
Tsai CS; Chang TC; Lai CH; Tsai CC; Ng KK; Hsueh S; Yen TC; Hong JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1506-12. PubMed ID: 15050330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning.
Grosu AL; Piert M; Weber WA; Jeremic B; Picchio M; Schratzenstaller U; Zimmermann FB; Schwaiger M; Molls M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Aug; 181(8):483-99. PubMed ID: 16044216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: role of pretreatment imaging and its influence on management.
Arya S; Rane P; Deshmukh A
Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):916-30. PubMed ID: 24908285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
