These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14603841)

  • 1. [A quantitative parameter for the objective comparison of the quality of the X-ray image visualization digital systems].
    Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):6-9. PubMed ID: 14603841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quant efficiency of the detection as a quality parameter of the visualization equipment].
    Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):19-21. PubMed ID: 14603845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methods of assessing the parameter detail-contrast of X-ray converting receivers].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Zelikman MI
    Med Tekh; 2001; (5):17-9. PubMed ID: 11669048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A study of digital x-ray detection systems with optical image transfer].
    Kanter BM; Vladimirov LV; Lygin VA; Medvedeva NA; Chuliukov GI
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):42-5. PubMed ID: 17133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality].
    Kyriakou Y; Kolditz D; Langner O; Krause J; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 20922645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE's Revolution digital radiography systems.
    Jabri KN; Uppaluri R; Xue P
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S215-20; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
    Neitzel U
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S227-33; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.