These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14603845)

  • 1. [Quant efficiency of the detection as a quality parameter of the visualization equipment].
    Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):19-21. PubMed ID: 14603845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A quantitative parameter for the objective comparison of the quality of the X-ray image visualization digital systems].
    Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):6-9. PubMed ID: 14603841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Definition of quantum efficiency of X-ray detectors].
    Zelikman MI
    Med Tekh; 2001; (4):5-11. PubMed ID: 11534295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
    Neitzel U
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S227-33; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of factors affecting the results of estimation of the detective quantum efficiency of digital X-ray detectors within high and low spatial frequency ranges].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2007; (5):6-9. PubMed ID: 18030766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in evaluating the performance of gamma camera systems.
    Starck SA; Båth M; Carlsson S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1601-9. PubMed ID: 15798346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Enhanced digitally reconstructed radiographs generated by ray tracing].
    Wang J; Wu Z; Zhang C; Hou Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):125-8, 142. PubMed ID: 15762132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital X-ray apparatus "Sibir'". Measurement of the value of a signal].
    Babichev EA; Baru SE; Neustroev VA; Porosev VV; Savinov GA; Sidorov VA; Ukraintsev IuG; Khabakpachev AG; Shekhtman LI; Iurchenko IuR
    Med Tekh; 2001; (5):3-7. PubMed ID: 11669052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Generalized quantum efficacy of digital x-ray devices].
    Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2008; (5):1-4. PubMed ID: 19048859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.