These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14604499)

  • 1. The value of digital imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
    Sharp PF; Olson J; Strachan F; Hipwell J; Ludbrook A; O'Donnell M; Wallace S; Goatman K; Grant A; Waugh N; McHardy K; Forrester JV
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(30):1-119. PubMed ID: 14604499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
    Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.
    Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodal imaging interpreted by graders to detect re-activation of diabetic eye disease in previously treated patients: the EMERALD diagnostic accuracy study.
    Lois N; Cook J; Wang A; Aldington S; Mistry H; Maredza M; McAuley D; Aslam T; Bailey C; Chong V; Ghanchi F; Scanlon P; Sivaprasad S; Steel D; Styles C; Azuara-Blanco A; Prior L; Waugh N
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(32):1-104. PubMed ID: 34060440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography.
    Liesenfeld B; Kohner E; Piehlmeier W; Kluthe S; Aldington S; Porta M; Bek T; Obermaier M; Mayer H; Mann G; Holle R; Hepp KD
    Diabetes Care; 2000 Mar; 23(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 10868863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Automated Teleretinal Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Walton OB; Garoon RB; Weng CY; Gross J; Young AK; Camero KA; Jin H; Carvounis PE; Coffee RE; Chu YI
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 134(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 26720694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
    Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
    Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond retinal screening: digital imaging in the assessment and follow-up of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Kerr D; Cavan DA; Jennings B; Dunnington C; Gold D; Crick M
    Diabet Med; 1998 Oct; 15(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 9796890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in an established urban screening programme: An 11-year cohort study.
    Cheyne CP; Burgess PI; Broadbent DM; García-Fiñana M; Stratton IM; Criddle T; Wang A; Alshukri A; Rahni MM; Vazquez-Arango P; Vora JP; Harding SP;
    Diabet Med; 2021 Sep; 38(9):e14583. PubMed ID: 33830513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
    Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial intelligence using deep learning to screen for referable and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Africa: a clinical validation study.
    Bellemo V; Lim ZW; Lim G; Nguyen QD; Xie Y; Yip MYT; Hamzah H; Ho J; Lee XQ; Hsu W; Lee ML; Musonda L; Chandran M; Chipalo-Mutati G; Muma M; Tan GSW; Sivaprasad S; Menon G; Wong TY; Ting DSW
    Lancet Digit Health; 2019 May; 1(1):e35-e44. PubMed ID: 33323239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
    Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy grading by an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm compared with a human standard for wide-field true-colour confocal scanning and standard digital retinal images.
    Olvera-Barrios A; Heeren TF; Balaskas K; Chambers R; Bolter L; Egan C; Tufail A; Anderson J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 32376611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Software: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness Compared with Human Graders.
    Tufail A; Rudisill C; Egan C; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Srinivas S; Nittala M; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Mar; 124(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 28024825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies.
    von Wendt G; Summanen P; Hallnäs K; Algvere P; Heikkilä K; Seregard S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An effective programme to systematic diabetic retinopathy screening in order to reduce diabetic retinopathy blindness.
    Papavasileiou E; Dereklis D; Oikonomidis P; Grixti A; Vineeth Kumar B; Prasad S
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2014; 17 Suppl 1():30-4. PubMed ID: 24392466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening.
    Scanlon PH; Foy C; Malhotra R; Aldington SJ
    Diabetes Care; 2005 Oct; 28(10):2448-53. PubMed ID: 16186278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.