These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14604852)

  • 1. Mechanistic inquiry into decrease in probability of defibrillation success with increase in complexity of preshock reentrant activity.
    Hillebrenner MG; Eason JC; Trayanova NA
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2004 Mar; 286(3):H909-17. PubMed ID: 14604852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization.
    Anderson C; Trayanova N; Skouibine K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 11(12):1386-96. PubMed ID: 11196563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
    Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Sweeney MB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Clin Invest; 1986 Mar; 77(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 3949979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
    Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postshock arrhythmogenesis in a slice of the canine heart.
    Hillebrenner MG; Eason JC; Campbell CA; Trayanova NA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10 Suppl):S249-56. PubMed ID: 14760930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phase singularities and termination of spiral wave reentry.
    Eason J; Trayanova N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Jul; 13(7):672-9. PubMed ID: 12139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of high-frequency biphasic shocks on ventricular vulnerability and defibrillation outcomes through synchronized virtual electrode responses.
    Chiou YA; Cheng LK; Lin SF
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232529. PubMed ID: 32357163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs.
    Windecker S; Kay GN; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 8(12):1386-95. PubMed ID: 9436776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of the relationship between preshock state and virtual electrode polarization-induced propagated graded responses resulting in arrhythmia induction.
    Bourn DW; Gray RA; Trayanova NA
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 16648066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective evaluation of the effect of biphasic waveform defibrillation on ventricular pacing thresholds.
    Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Gleva MJ; Anderson J; Troutman C; Bardy GH
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 8(5):485-95. PubMed ID: 9160224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Heil JE; Jones J; Lang DJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 9121980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the role of the coronary vasculature in the mechanisms of defibrillation.
    Bishop MJ; Plank G; Vigmond E
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Feb; 5(1):210-9. PubMed ID: 22157522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy levels for defibrillation: what is of real clinical importance?
    Fotuhi PC; Epstein AE; Ideker RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 83(5B):24D-33D. PubMed ID: 10089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual electrodes and deexcitation: new insights into fibrillation induction and defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Gray RA; Roth BJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 11(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 10749359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preshock phase singularity and the outcome of ventricular defibrillation.
    Hayashi H; Lin SF; Chen PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Jul; 4(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 17599680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tunnel propagation of postshock activations as a hypothesis for fibrillation induction and isoelectric window.
    Ashihara T; Constantino J; Trayanova NA
    Circ Res; 2008 Mar; 102(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 18218982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.