These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14604852)

  • 21. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High and low strength nonsynchronized shocks given during canine ventricular tachycardia.
    McClelland JH; Daubert JP; Kavanagh KM; Harrell FE; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jul; 15(7):986-92. PubMed ID: 1378609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev T; Tchou PJ
    Circ Res; 1998 May; 82(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 9576111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of shock timing on efficacy and safety of internal cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia.
    Li HG; Yee R; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Klein GJ; Zardini M; Thakur RK; Morillo CA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):703-8. PubMed ID: 8077542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9988003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Defibrillation of the heart: insights into mechanisms from modelling studies.
    Trayanova N
    Exp Physiol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):323-37. PubMed ID: 16469820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation.
    Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.
    Dosdall DJ; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Mar; 4(3 Suppl):S51-6. PubMed ID: 17336885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High dispersion of ventricular repolarization after an implantable defibrillator shock predicts induction of ventricular fibrillation as well as unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Moubarak JB; Karasik PE; Fletcher RD; Franz MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 35(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 10676690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of lower-energy biphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a follow-up clinical study.
    Higgins SL; O'Grady SG; Banville I; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; Lank P; Walker RG; Ilina M
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2004; 8(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 15295725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.
    Rodríguez B; Li L; Eason JC; Efimov IR; Trayanova NA
    Circ Res; 2005 Jul; 97(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 15976315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improvement of defibrillation efficacy with preshock synchronized pacing.
    Pak HN; Okuyama Y; Oh YS; Hayashi H; Liu YB; Chen PS; Lin SF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 15(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 15149429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Aguel F; Cheng Y; Wollenzier B; Trayanova N
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2000 Sep; 279(3):H1055-70. PubMed ID: 10993768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Winkle RA; Mead RH; Ruder MA; Smith NA; Buch WS; Gaudiani VA
    Circulation; 1990 May; 81(5):1477-81. PubMed ID: 2331763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bispectral energies within electrocardiograms during ventricular fibrillation are correlated with defibrillation shock outcome.
    Patwardhan A; Wang K; Moghe S; Leonelli F
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 10199693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.