410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14605337)
1. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical politics. Sex studies 'properly' approved.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):741. PubMed ID: 14764836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 2008 budget. Senators offer sympathetic ear to complaints on NIH's fiscal slide.
Couzin J
Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5819):1646. PubMed ID: 17379778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting priorities for science support.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 9669178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Appropriations. House bill signals the end of NIH's double-digit growth.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5628):2019. PubMed ID: 12829757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomedical research. A low-stress scheme for overhauling NIH's structure.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5633):574-5. PubMed ID: 12893911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-aim blame for NIH's hard times.
Bishop JM; Varmus H
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):499. PubMed ID: 16645053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stymied sex survey.
Science; 1991 Apr; 252(5005):497. PubMed ID: 2020848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH begins review of studies that were questioned at a congressional hearing.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(11):A24. PubMed ID: 15287135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
Couzin J
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking grant review.
Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An open letter to Elias Zerhouni.
Altman S; Bassler BL; Beckwith J; Belfort M; Berg HC; Bloom B; Brenchley JE; Campbell A; Collier RJ; Connell N; Cozzarelli NR; Craig NL; Darst S; Ebright RH; Elledge SJ; Falkow S; Galan JE; Gottesman M; Gourse R; Grindley ND; Gross CA; Grossman A; Hochschild A; Howe M; Hurwitz J; Isberg RR; Kaplan S; Kornberg A; Kustu SG; Landick RC; Landy A; Levy SB; Losick R; Long SR; Maloy SR; Mekalanos JJ; Neidhardt FC; Pace NR; Ptashne M; Roberts JW; Roth JR; Rothman-Denes LB; Salyers A; Schaechter M; Shapiro L; Silhavy TJ; Simon MI; Walker G; Yanofsky C; Zinder N
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1409-10. PubMed ID: 15746409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. ASPB's response to NIH's public access policy.
Jorgensen RA; Raikhel NV; Ort D
Plant Cell; 2005 Jun; 17(6):1637. PubMed ID: 15929977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH response to open letter.
Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
