135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14606133)
1. Abnormal cervical cytology: new names, familiar smears.
Carulli DT
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2003 Oct; 15(10):444-9. PubMed ID: 14606133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for cervical cancer. Current terminology, classification, and technique.
Fowler J
Postgrad Med; 1993 Feb; 93(2):57-64, 70. PubMed ID: 8381956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New advances transform the management of women with abnormal pap tests.
Jin XW; Nielsen C; Brainard J; Yen-Lieberman B
Cleve Clin J Med; 2003 Jul; 70(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 12882387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pap smears and screening for cervical neoplasia.
Wilkinson EJ
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 33(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 2289348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Appleby J
Med Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 79(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 7877395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.
Oren A; Fernandes J
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 May; 91(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 2061103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Back to the negative Pap test: behind the scenes at Bethesda 2001.
Young NA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Apr; 26(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 11933263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?
Moseley RP; Paget S
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 11952745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [New classification in cervical cytology: the Bethesda system].
Bodó M; Tóth V
Orv Hetil; 1991 May; 132(19):1039-40. PubMed ID: 2027678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 1988 Bethesda system for cervical vaginal cytology: pros and cons.
Barlow JF
S D J Med; 1991 Jun; 44(6):157-8. PubMed ID: 1658929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014. "The reports of my demise have been greatly exaggerated." (after a quotation from Mark Twain).
Nayar R; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 25997404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Papanicolaou smear: an update on classification and management.
Fullerton JT; Barger MK
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1989; 1(3):84-90. PubMed ID: 2631935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical Papanicolaou Smears in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: High Prevalence of Therapy-Related Atypia during the Acute Phase.
Yu SC; Huang HH; Li CC; Tang JL; Lee YH; Mao TL; Kuo KT; Lin CT; Liu JH; Ko BS; Yao M
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2017 Aug; 23(8):1367-1373. PubMed ID: 28450182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bethesda 2014: improving on a paradigm shift.
Wilbur DC; Nayar R
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 26767599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Is Bethesda system better than Pap classification?].
Vuopala S
Duodecim; 1999; 115(18):2030-4. PubMed ID: 11941821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: A Historical Perspective.
Nayar R; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):359-372. PubMed ID: 28693017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Bethesda system for classification of Pap smears: the clinical experience of one cancer screening center.
Mahon SM
Cancer Nurs; 1995 Dec; 18(6):458-66. PubMed ID: 8564942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Pap smear screening results between Akha hill tribe and urban women in Chiang Rai province, Thailand.
Kritpetcharat O; Wutichouy W; Sirijaichingkul S; Kritpetcharat P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(11):5501-4. PubMed ID: 23317207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Bethesda system for cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses.
Herbst AL
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 35(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1544245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
