BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1460664)

  • 1. Evaluation of mammographic stellate lesions.
    Flowers WM; Powers CI
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 33(10):359-60. PubMed ID: 1460664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benign circumscribed breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic appearance.
    Schepps B; Scola FH; Frates RE
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Sep; 21(3):519-37. PubMed ID: 7816411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
    Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
    Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation of radial scar from scirrhous carcinoma of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Harris MN; Roses DF
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 2554361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised?
    Middleton LP; Grant S; Stephens T; Stelling CB; Sneige N; Sahin AA
    Mod Pathol; 2003 Feb; 16(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 12591964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
    Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radial scar and carcinoma of the breast: microscopic findings in 32 cases.
    Mokbel K; Price RK; Mostafa A; Williams N; Wells CA; Perry N; Carpenter R
    Breast; 1999 Dec; 8(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 14731463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excisional breast biopsy: when, why and how?
    Bellantone R; Rossi S; Lombardi CP; Cinini C; Minelli S; Crucitti F
    Int Surg; 1995; 80(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 7657498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 1732936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound imaging features of radial scars of the breast.
    Lee E; Wylie E; Metcalf C
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 17504315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic technique to assess nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.
    Fuhrman G; Cederbom G; Champagne J; Farr G; McKinnon W; Bolton J; Ordoyne WK
    J La State Med Soc; 1996 Apr; 148(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 8935619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radiosurgical labeling of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Aguirre B; GutiƩrrez L; Ortega D; Laupheimer S; Taborga M
    Rev Med Chil; 1997 Sep; 125(9):1032-5. PubMed ID: 9595794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast masses: mammographic evaluation.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 2678242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radial scar and tubular carcinoma. Mammographic and sonographic findings.
    Vega A; Garijo F
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jan; 34(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8427748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Architectural distortion and diagnostic difficulties].
    Digabel-Chabay C; Allioux C; Labbe-Devilliers C; Meingan P; Ricaud Couprie M
    J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 2):2099-106. PubMed ID: 15692426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression.
    Berkowitz JE; Gatewood OM; Gayler BW
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):369-71. PubMed ID: 2704800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can sonography be used to help differentiate between radial scars and breast cancers?
    Cawson JN
    Breast; 2005 Oct; 14(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 16216736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3B circumscribed masses: to assess or not to assess?
    Bonetti F; Manfrin E
    Br J Cancer; 2008 Aug; 99(4):675-6; author reply 677-8. PubMed ID: 18682716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenolipoma of the Breast: A Clinicoradiological Entity and Pathologist's Dilemma!
    Ram D; Selvakumar VP
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jun; 10(6):XD03-XD04. PubMed ID: 27504390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Masses in Biological Females.
    Swain M; Jeudy M
    JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(3):294-295. PubMed ID: 35771591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.