These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14606768)
1. Errors by surgical pathologists in India: results of a questionnaire survey. Pai SA Natl Med J India; 2003; 16(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 14606768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communicating pathology and laboratory errors: anatomic pathologists' and laboratory medical directors' attitudes and experiences. Dintzis SM; Stetsenko GY; Sitlani CM; Gronowski AM; Astion ML; Gallagher TH Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 May; 135(5):760-5. PubMed ID: 21502431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs. Novis DA Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of parameters to ensure quality control in histopathology reporting: a meta-analysis at a tertiary care center. Qureshi A; Loya A; Azam M; Hussain M; Mushtaq S; Mahmood T Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 22771639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error. Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade of acceptable autopsy rates. Does concordance of clinician and pathologist views explain relative success? McManus BM; Suvalsky SD; Wilson JE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1128-36. PubMed ID: 1444741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Present situation of pTNM classification in Japan: questionnaire survey of the pathologists of Gan-shinryo-renkei-kyoten Byoin (local core cancer hospitals) on pTNM classification. Teramoto N; Tanimizu M; Nishimura R Pathol Int; 2009 Mar; 59(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 19261094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Fabri PJ; Zayas-Castro JL Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):557-63; discussion 563-5. PubMed ID: 18847639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An audit on the reporting of critical results in a tertiary institute. Rensburg MA; Nutt L; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 46(Pt 2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19225027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Schiff GD; Hasan O; Kim S; Abrams R; Cosby K; Lambert BL; Elstein AS; Hasler S; Kabongo ML; Krosnjar N; Odwazny R; Wisniewski MF; McNutt RA Arch Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 169(20):1881-7. PubMed ID: 19901140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist. Safrin RE; Bark CJ Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care. Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses. Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective error recording in surgery: an analysis of 1108 elective neurosurgical cases. Stone S; Bernstein M Neurosurgery; 2007 Jun; 60(6):1075-80; discussion 1080-2. PubMed ID: 17538382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do faculty and resident physicians discuss their medical errors? Kaldjian LC; Forman-Hoffman VL; Jones EW; Wu BJ; Levi BH; Rosenthal GE J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):717-22. PubMed ID: 18827101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]