89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14607292)
1. Maximum likelihood estimator and likelihood ratio test in complex models: an application to B lymphocyte development.
Gorfine M; Freedman L; Shahaf G; Mehr R
Bull Math Biol; 2003 Nov; 65(6):1131-9. PubMed ID: 14607292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of pattern-mixture models to outcomes that are potentially missing not at random using pseudo maximum likelihood estimation.
Shen C; Weissfeld L
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):333-47. PubMed ID: 15772110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.
Vonesh EF; Chinchilli VM; Pu K
Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):572-87. PubMed ID: 10766504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
Saha KK; Paul SR
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A statistical model for dissecting genomic imprinting through genetic mapping.
Cui Y; Cheverud JM; Wu R
Genetica; 2007 Jul; 130(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 16955328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A stochastic regression model for general trend analysis of longitudinal continuous data.
Chao WH; Chen SH
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):571-87. PubMed ID: 19655314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variance components model with disequilibria.
Yuan A; Chen G; Yang Q; Rotimi C; Bonney G
Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 14(8):941-52. PubMed ID: 16724004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A maximum likelihood approach to density estimation with semidefinite programming.
Fushiki T; Horiuchi S; Tsuchiya T
Neural Comput; 2006 Nov; 18(11):2777-812. PubMed ID: 16999579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A statistical framework for genome-wide scanning and testing of imprinted quantitative trait loci.
Cui Y
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16959270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistics of the log-det estimator.
Massingham T; Goldman N
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 17703055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Penalized likelihood phylogenetic inference: bridging the parsimony-likelihood gap.
Kim J; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 18853355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A maximum likelihood method for studying gene-environment interactions under conditional independence of genotype and exposure.
Cheng KF
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3093-109. PubMed ID: 16463309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint frailty models for recurring events and death using maximum penalized likelihood estimation: application on cancer events.
Rondeau V; Mathoulin-Pelissier S; Jacqmin-Gadda H; Brouste V; Soubeyran P
Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):708-21. PubMed ID: 17267392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.
Anisimova M; Gascuel O
Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 16785212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
