These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14607774)

  • 1. Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks.
    Spencer RM; Zelaznik HN
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Dec; 35(4):371-81. PubMed ID: 14607774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing precision in circle drawing does not depend on spatial precision of the timing target.
    Biberstine J; Zelaznik HN; Kennedy L; Whetter E
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Nov; 37(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 16280315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of dominant versus non-dominant hand on event and emergent motor timing.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Feb; 27(1):29-52. PubMed ID: 18191491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coordination dynamics and attentional costs of continuous and discontinuous bimanual circle drawing movements.
    Summers JJ; Maeder S; Hiraga CY; Alexander JR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Oct; 27(5):823-37. PubMed ID: 18226840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Circle drawing does not exhibit auditory-motor synchronization.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 21462066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 21300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing.
    Zelaznik HN; Spencer RM; Ivry RB; Baria A; Bloom M; Dolansky L; Justice S; Patterson K; Whetter E
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Sep; 37(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16120566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability.
    Zelaznik HN; Spencer RM; Doffin JG
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Jun; 32(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 11005948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct timing mechanisms are implicated in distinct circle drawing tasks.
    Huys R; Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN; Jirsa VK
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 472(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 20117170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN; Balasubramaniam R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1086-100. PubMed ID: 22332846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event.
    Zelaznik HN; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1565-75. PubMed ID: 20731516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.
    Zelaznik HN; Spencer RM; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):575-88. PubMed ID: 12075889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comfortable synchronization of cyclic drawing movements with a metronome.
    Repp BH
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Feb; 30(1):18-39. PubMed ID: 21185101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous event-based and emergent timing: synchronization, continuation, and phase correction.
    Repp BH; Steinman SR
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 20189907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the co-existence of two timing strategies for motor control in a unique task: The synchronisation spatial-tapping task.
    Dione M; Delevoye-Turrell Y
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():45-60. PubMed ID: 26203523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aging effects on event and emergent timing in bimanual coordination.
    Summers JJ; Lewis J; Fujiyama H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Oct; 29(5):820-30. PubMed ID: 19931202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks.
    Merchant H; Zarco W; Prado L
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):939-49. PubMed ID: 18094101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear versus non-linear measures of temporal variability in finger tapping and their relation to performance on open- versus closed-loop motor tasks: comparing standard deviations to Lyapunov exponents.
    Christman SD; Weaver R
    Laterality; 2008 May; 13(3):255-81. PubMed ID: 18449841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control.
    Robertson SD; Zelaznik HN; Lantero DA; Bojczyk KG; Spencer RM; Doffin JG; Schneidt T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1316-30. PubMed ID: 10531665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the timing basis of bimanual coordination in discrete and continuous tasks.
    Semjen A
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Feb; 48(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 11812038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.