138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14608290)
1. Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.
Sonne C; Xie F; Lof J; Oberdorfer J; Phillips P; Carr Everbach E; Porter TR
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Nov; 16(11):1178-85. PubMed ID: 14608290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbubble responses to a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion imaging techniques.
Porter TR; Oberdorfer J; Rafter P; Lof J; Xie F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 29(8):1187-92. PubMed ID: 12946521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging.
Porter TR; Xie F; Silver M; Kricsfeld D; Oleary E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Mar; 37(3):748-53. PubMed ID: 11693747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rest-Stress Limb Perfusion Imaging in Humans with Contrast Ultrasound Using Intermediate-Power Imaging and Microbubbles Resistant to Inertial Cavitation.
Davidson BP; Hodovan J; Belcik JT; Moccetti F; Xie A; Ammi AY; Lindner JR
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 May; 30(5):503-510.e1. PubMed ID: 28238588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of emission power on the destruction of echo contrast agents and on the origin of tissue harmonic signals using power pulse-inversion imaging.
Tiemann K; Veltmann C; Ghanem A; Lohmaier S; Bruce M; Kuntz-Hehner S; Pohl C; Ehlgen A; Schlosser T; Omran H; Becher H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1525-33. PubMed ID: 11750752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the usefulness of the mechanical index displayed on clinical ultrasound scanners for predicting contrast microbubble destruction.
Forsberg F; Shi WT; Merritt CR; Dai Q; Solcova M; Goldberg BB
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Apr; 24(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 15784762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power.
Eckersley RJ; Chin CT; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 15708461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents.
Moran CM; Anderson T; Pye SD; Sboros V; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 10856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time contrast ultrasound muscle perfusion imaging with intermediate-power imaging coupled with acoustically durable microbubbles.
Seol SH; Davidson BP; Belcik JT; Mott BH; Goodman RM; Ammi A; Lindner JR
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jun; 28(6):718-26.e2. PubMed ID: 25769666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography: in vitro evaluation of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for in vivo optimization.
Back SJ; Edgar JC; Canning DA; Darge K
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Sep; 45(10):1496-505. PubMed ID: 25930084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of the size distribution and myocardial contrast effect of perfluorocarbon-filled albumin microbubbles by lyophilization under continuous negative pressure.
Chen S; Wang Z; Zhou YT; Grayburn PA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2000 Aug; 13(8):748-53. PubMed ID: 10936818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of retained microbubbles in carotid arteries with real-time low mechanical index imaging in the setting of endothelial dysfunction.
Tsutsui JM; Xie F; Cano M; Chomas J; Phillips P; Radio SJ; Lof J; Porter TR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 44(5):1036-46. PubMed ID: 15337216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential pitfalls of visualization of myocardial perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic gray scale B-mode and power Doppler imaging.
Masugata H; Yukiiri K; Takagi Y; Ohmori K; Mizushige K; Kohno M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Apr; 20(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 15068143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.
Sassaroli E; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 17590501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased ultrasound contrast and decreased microbubble destruction rates with triggered ultrasound imaging.
Porter TR; Xie F; Li S; D'Sa A; Rafter P
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1996; 9(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 8887861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound administration setups on microbubble enhancement: a focus on pediatric applications.
Kramer MR; Bhagat N; Back SJ; Poznick L; Forsberg F; Darge K; Eisenbrey JR
Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Jan; 48(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 28894889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved sonothrombolysis from a modified diagnostic transducer delivering impulses containing a longer pulse duration.
Wu J; Xie F; Kumar T; Liu J; Lof J; Shi W; Everbach EC; Porter TR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1545-53. PubMed ID: 24613551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion at rest in a patient with left main coronary artery stenosis.
Hagendorff A; Pfeiffer D; Rother T; Becher H
Z Kardiol; 2003 Oct; 92(10):876-83. PubMed ID: 14579053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single microbubble response using pulse sequences: initial results.
Thomas DH; Butler MB; Anderson T; Steel R; Pye SD; Poland M; Brock-Fisher T; McDicken WN; Sboros V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 18845380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
