These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14608506)

  • 1. Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli.
    Kunde W; Wühr P
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 14608506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA; De Labra C
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceiving while acting: action affects perception.
    Schubö A; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):208-15. PubMed ID: 12898251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19214563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR; Behmer LP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1446-60. PubMed ID: 22777733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simon effects in change detection and change blindness.
    Schankin A; Hagemann D; Wascher E
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25408533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-intentional but not automatic: reduction of word- and arrow-based compatibility effects by sound distractors in the same categorical domain.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Oct; 199(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 19688202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment.
    Sohn MH; Carlson RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):907-16. PubMed ID: 15000538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of unilateral distractors: a comparison of eye movement and key press responses.
    Machado L; Franz E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1173-90. PubMed ID: 15513242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: evidence for the conceptual coding of action.
    Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 16447382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial coding of word-initial letters: evidence from a Simon-like task.
    Treccani B; Cubelli R; Della Sala S; Umiltà C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 18605498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.