222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14610765)
21. Murderer can be forced to take medication to become sane enough to be executed.
Gottlieb S
BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):889. PubMed ID: 14563734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Supreme Court limits permissible scope of government's ability to force medication of mentally ill defendants.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):737-9. PubMed ID: 14968679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The need to commute the death sentence: competency for execution and ethical dilemmas for mental health professionals.
Wallace DH
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 1399188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Madness on trial.
Cornwall J
New Sci; 2003 Mar; 177(2386):27. PubMed ID: 14587492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Mar; (311):9-33. PubMed ID: 15869037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Developments in the law: the law of mental illness.
Harv Law Rev; 2008 Feb; 121(4):1114-91. PubMed ID: 18354871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
Nakajima N
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?
Gerbasi JB; Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15497635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On the execution of the death penalty.
Slovenko R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):282-4. PubMed ID: 14584525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Exploring ethical, legal, and professional issues with the mentally ill on death row.
Plichta JE
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 18798882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Sell effect: involuntary medication treatment is a "clear and convincing" success.
Cochrane RE; Herbel BL; Reardon ML; Lloyd KP
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22746284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
