These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14610765)
81. Singleton's story: choosing between psychosis and execution. Spring JC Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):30-3. PubMed ID: 16092399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
82. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cichon DE LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
83. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial. Borger BA Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. Knepper K Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. The right to refuse antipsychotic medication: who decides? Zajc M Med Law; 1987; 6(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 2883550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. US Supreme Court limits forced drugging of mentally ill before trial. But the court's new rules say that defendants can be forced to take drugs under limited conditions. Ashraf H Lancet; 2003 Jun; 361(9375):2131. PubMed ID: 12826441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. Evaluating Competency for Execution after Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):530-535. PubMed ID: 32675330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding. Ragatz L; Vitacco MJ; Tross R Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Dec; 59(14):1505-19. PubMed ID: 25080435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Ferguson v. Florida: rationally understanding competence to be executed? Wadsworth CS; Newman WJ; Burton PR J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 24986351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Dementia and the Death Penalty. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Nov; 49(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 31813185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Washington v. Harper: prisoners' rights to refuse antipsychotic medication. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 Jul; 41(7):731-2. PubMed ID: 1973135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. Legally untreatable--a new category of long stay patient? Chan MP; Conacher GN Can J Psychiatry; 1994 Sep; 39(7):433-5. PubMed ID: 7987786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Neuropsychiatric Reflections on Fozdar MA J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Jun; 48(2):151-154. PubMed ID: 32513759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. The Connecticut Experience with Norko MA; Cotterell MS; Hollis T J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 32675332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Hall v. Florida: Capital Punishment, IQ, and Persons With Intellectual Disabilities. Cooke BK; Delalot D; Werner TL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 26071514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Competency to be executed: Panetti v. Quarterman. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2007; 31(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 17969780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Judges make historic ruling on euthanasia. Sheldon T BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6946):7-8. PubMed ID: 11644564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court's "Method of Execution" Jurisprudence. Dow DR; Newberry JR Yale J Biol Med; 2019 Dec; 92(4):793-803. PubMed ID: 31866796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]