These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1461214)

  • 1. Testing mammography equipment: evolution over a 4-year period.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Fox SA; Solberg T
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1491-5. PubMed ID: 1461214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009.
    Gershan V; Antevska-Grujoska S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):187-91. PubMed ID: 21733866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance in screening mammography.
    Health Devices; 1990; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography in the Norwegian breast-screening programme.
    Pedersen K; Nordanger J
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Feb; 12(2):463-70. PubMed ID: 11870451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Physical and technical quality assurance in German breast cancer screening: progress report of the Reference Center Muenster after three years].
    Sommer A; Girnus R; Wendt B; Czwoydzinski J; Wüstenbecker C; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19391067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls.
    Nassivera E; Nardin L
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):612-8. PubMed ID: 9227255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of quality assurance regulatory enforcement on performance of mammography systems: evidence from large-scale surveys in Taiwan.
    Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Chen CC; Tsay PK; Pan HB; Hsu GC; Lin JH; Chui CS; Wan YL; Liu HL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W307-12. PubMed ID: 23883245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of radiation dose, focal spot, and automatic exposure of newer film-screen mammography units.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Nov; 149(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 3499794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA.
    Destouet JM; Bassett LW; Yaffe MJ; Butler PF; Wilcox PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 17411883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
    Butler PF
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 18374533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.