These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14612326)

  • 1. The emotional quality of speech in voice services.
    Maffiolo V; Chateau N
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct 20-Nov 15; 46(13-14):1375-85. PubMed ID: 14612326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotions in [a]: a perceptual and acoustic study.
    Toivanen J; Waaramaa T; Alku P; Laukkanen AM; Seppänen T; Väyrynen E; Airas M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16517522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perception of emotional intonation of noisy speech signal with different acoustic parameters by adults of different age and gender].
    Dmitrieva ES; Gel'man VIa
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2011; 61(3):306-16. PubMed ID: 21861386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploratory study of some acoustic and articulatory characteristics of sad speech.
    Erickson D; Yoshida K; Menezes C; Fujino A; Mochida T; Shibuya Y
    Phonetica; 2006; 63(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 16514273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
    Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in familiar voice identification.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():131-40. PubMed ID: 23168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of human personal features on acoustic correlates of speech emotional intonation characteristics].
    Dmitrieva ES; Gel'man VIa; Zaĭtseva KA; Orlov AM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2009; 59(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19947529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice similarity in identical twins.
    Van Gysel WD; Vercammen J; Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2001; 55(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11256192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early emotional prosody perception based on different speaker voices.
    Paulmann S; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 18185110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech.
    Formisano E; De Martino F; Bonte M; Goebel R
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):970-3. PubMed ID: 18988858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.
    Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the intentional voice quality on the impression of female speaker.
    Lukkarila P; Laukkanen AM; Palo P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Dec; 37(4):158-66. PubMed ID: 22616785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages.
    Swerts M; Hirschberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1337-45. PubMed ID: 20815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.