These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14612326)

  • 21. Perception of pre-vocalic and post-vocalic consonants produced by tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Doyle PC; Haaf RG
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Dec; 18(7):350-3. PubMed ID: 2593219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Production-specific changes in emotional impression of speech: dimensions and acoustic correlates of impression formation].
    Tischer B
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(4):644-75. PubMed ID: 8310720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
    Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Listener impressions of speakers with Parkinson's disease.
    Jaywant A; Pell MD
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19758475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Emotional speech acoustic model for Malay: iterative versus isolated unit training.
    Mustafa MB; Ainon RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3057-66. PubMed ID: 24116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A "voice inversion effect?".
    Bédard C; Belin P
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):247-9. PubMed ID: 15177788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DECtalk and VeriVox: intelligibility, likeability, and rate preference differences for four listener groups.
    Von Berg S; Panorska A; Uken D; Qeadan F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 19280420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of irregular voices after total and laser surgical partial laryngectomy.
    Olthoff A; Mrugalla S; Laskawi R; Fröhlich M; Stuermer I; Kruse E; Ambrosch P; Steiner W
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 12975275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An acoustic and perceptual study of initial stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jan; 21(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 17364614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Distinction of emotions according to the speech melody and various problems of group psychotherapy].
    Bazin EF; Kornjeva TV
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1980 Mar; 32(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 7413851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Multiparametric description of voice quality for normal male and female voices based on acoustic analyses].
    Pützer M; Wokurek W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Feb; 85(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 16498539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab.
    Smits I; Ceuppens P; De Bodt MS
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15907433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of Parkinson's disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.
    Pell MD; Cheang HS; Leonard CL
    Brain Lang; 2006 May; 97(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 16226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Telephone Transmission and Earwitnesses: Performance on Voice Parades Controlled for Voice Similarity.
    McDougall K; Nolan F; Hudson T
    Phonetica; 2015; 72(4):257-72. PubMed ID: 26633169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impressions of Personality from Intentional Voice Quality in Arabic-Speaking and Native Finnish-Speaking Listeners.
    Waaramaa T; Lukkarila P; Järvinen K; Geneid A; Laukkanen AM
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):326.e21-326.e28. PubMed ID: 31597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.