These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614243)

  • 1. Heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing among covariate-defined subgroups: issues and findings for affected relatives.
    Bull SB; Mirea L; Briollais L; Logan AG
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):94-106. PubMed ID: 14614243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tests for covariate-associated heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing of affected relatives.
    Mirea L; Briollais L; Bull S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 14691956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of uninformative families in mean allele sharing tests for linkage.
    Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Wang T; Elston RC; Weeks DE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article13. PubMed ID: 17049024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tree-based model for allele-sharing-based linkage analysis in human complex diseases.
    Xu W; Schulze TG; DePaulo JR; Bull SB; McMahon FJ; Greenwood CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 16385469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixture models for linkage analysis of affected sibling pairs and covariates.
    Devlin B; Jones BL; Bacanu SA; Roeder K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 11754473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs.
    Dizier MH; Quesneville H; Prum B; Selinger-Leneman H; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):433-42. PubMed ID: 11281281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased efficiency of case-control association analysis by using allele-sharing and covariate information.
    Schmidt S; Schmidt MA; Qin X; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 17934318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of affected sib pairs, with covariates--with and without constraints.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Mar; 64(3):871-85. PubMed ID: 10053022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional multipoint linkage analysis using affected sib pairs: an alternative approach.
    Chiu YF; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14748010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 'model-free' and 'model-based' linkage statistics in the presence of locus heterogeneity: single data set and multiple data set applications.
    Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 11287743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Xu W; Ma J; Greenwood CMT; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():343-373. PubMed ID: 28980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing whether an allele can account in part for a linkage signal: the Genotype-IBD Sharing Test (GIST).
    Li C; Scott LJ; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Mar; 74(3):418-31. PubMed ID: 14872409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allele-sharing statistics using information on family history.
    Callegaro A; Meulenbelt I; Kloppenburg M; Slagboom PE; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Nov; 74(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 20707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using identity-by-descent information in affected sib pairs to increase the efficiency of genetic association studies.
    Wicks J; Treloar SA; Martin NG
    Twin Res; 2004 Apr; 7(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 15169605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.