These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614414)
1. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I; Berk NW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Nov; 124(5):488-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 14614414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):234-43; quiz 339. PubMed ID: 12970656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block. Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Appelbe P; Davies L; Connolly I; Mitchell L; Littlewood S; Mandall N; Lewis D; Sandler J; Hammond M; Chadwick S; O'Neill J; McDade C; Oskouei M; Thiruvenkatachari B; Read M; Robinson S; Birnie D; Murray A; Shaw I; Harradine N; Worthington H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 19409339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is early treatment for Class II malocclusion effective? Results from a randomized controlled trial. O'Brien K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4 Suppl):S64-5. PubMed ID: 16644420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-concept, Class II malocclusion, and early treatment. Dann C; Phillips C; Broder HL; Tulloch JF Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 8702066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion. Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Freeman DC; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Fränkel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):570.e1-6; discussion 570-1. PubMed ID: 19409337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12923506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New horizons in orthodontics & dentofacial orthopedics: fixed Twin Blocks & TransForce lingual appliances. Clark WJ Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21561020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes. Sharma AA; Lee RT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of malocclusion and its treatment on the quality of life of adolescents. Taylor KR; Kiyak A; Huang GJ; Greenlee GM; Jolley CJ; King GJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 19732673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance. Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II malocclusion: why, when and how to treat this anomaly in mixed dentition with fixed functional appliances. Ritto AK J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(4):9-21. PubMed ID: 11822159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Chintakanon K; Sampson W; Wilkinson T; Townsend G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 11094363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]