BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614747)

  • 1. Comparison between the enzymatic vitros assay for creatinine determination and three other methods adapted on the Olympus analyzer.
    Badiou S; Dupuy AM; Descomps B; Cristolead JP
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2003; 17(6):235-40. PubMed ID: 14614747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation and evaluation of the Randox full-range CRP assay on the Olympus AU2700.
    Dupuy AM; Michon AL; Badiou S; Cristol JP
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2007; 21(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 17245762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccuracy of routine creatinine measurement in canine urine.
    Trumel C; Diquélou A; Lefebvre H; Braun JP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2004; 33(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 15334346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creatinine concentration in plasma from dog, rat, and mouse: a comparison of 3 different methods.
    Palm M; Lundblad A
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2005 Sep; 34(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 16134070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exogenous interferences with Jaffe creatinine assays: addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to reagent eliminates bilirubin and total protein interference with Jaffe methods.
    Srisawasdi P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Teerakanjana N; Vanavanan S; Kroll MH
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 20486190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between ADVIA Chemistry systems Enzymatic Creatinine_2 method and ADVIA Chemistry systems Creatinine method (kinetic Jaffe method) for determining creatinine.
    Hermida FJ; Lorenzo MJ; Pérez A; Fernández M; Sagastagoia O; Magadán C
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Oct; 74(7):629-36. PubMed ID: 24988313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interferences of o-raffinose cross-linked hemoglobin in three methods for serum creatinine.
    Ali AC; Mihas CC; Campbell JA
    Clin Chem; 1997 Sep; 43(9):1738-43. PubMed ID: 9299969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Olympus AU 400 clinical chemistry analyzer.
    Bilić A; Alpeza I; Rukavina AS
    Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10745974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prime time for enzymatic creatinine methods in pediatrics.
    Cobbaert CM; Baadenhuijsen H; Weykamp CW
    Clin Chem; 2009 Mar; 55(3):549-58. PubMed ID: 19168555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and Analytical Impact of Moving from Jaffe to Enzymatic Serum Creatinine Methodology.
    Syme NR; Stevens K; Stirling C; McMillan DC; Talwar D
    J Appl Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 5(4):631-642. PubMed ID: 32447368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and comparison of Abbott Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods: Could the old method meet the new requirements?
    Küme T; Sağlam B; Ergon C; Sisman AR
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Jan; 32(1):. PubMed ID: 28205269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deproteinization of serum: another best approach to eliminate all forms of bilirubin interference on serum creatinine by the kinetic Jaffe reaction.
    Lolekha PH; Jaruthunyaluck S; Srisawasdi P
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2001; 15(3):116-21. PubMed ID: 11344525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enzymatic but not compensated Jaffe methods reach the desirable specifications of NKDEP at normal levels of creatinine. Results of the French multicentric evaluation.
    Boutten A; Bargnoux AS; Carlier MC; Delanaye P; Rozet E; Delatour V; Cavalier E; Hanser AM; Froissart M; Cristol JP; Piéroni L;
    Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Apr; 419():132-5. PubMed ID: 23415696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of ingested nitromethane and reliable creatinine assessment using multiple common analytical methods.
    Murphy CM; Devlin JJ; Beuhler MC; Cheifetz P; Maynard S; Schwartz MD; Kacinko S
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2018 Apr; 56(4):237-244. PubMed ID: 28814126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Catecholamine interference in enzymatic creatinine assays.
    Saenger AK; Lockwood C; Snozek CL; Milz TC; Karon BS; Scott MG; Jaffe AS
    Clin Chem; 2009 Sep; 55(9):1732-6. PubMed ID: 19589845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilirubin and metamizol do not interfere with the randox enzymatic creatinine test. An evaluation of a new enzymatic creatinine determination method.
    Harmoinen AP
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Dec; 34(12):975-6. PubMed ID: 8986403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creatinine assays: time for action?
    Lawson N; Lang T; Broughton A; Prinsloo P; Turner C; Marenah C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):599-602. PubMed ID: 12564843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of measurements of canine plasma creatinine, glucose, proteins, urea, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase obtained with Spotchem SP 4430 and Vitros 250 analyzers.
    Trumel C; Diquélou A; Germain C; Palanché F; Braun JP
    Res Vet Sci; 2005 Dec; 79(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16054888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a third party enzymatic ammonia method for use on the Roche Cobas 6000 (c501) automated platform.
    Seiden-Long I; Schnabl K; Skoropadyk W; Lennon N; McKeage A
    Clin Biochem; 2014 Aug; 47(12):1116-20. PubMed ID: 24792455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of measurements of canine plasma glucose, creatinine, urea, total proteins, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase obtained with the APOLOWAKO and Vitros 250 analyzers.
    Geffré A; Braun JP; Germain C; Palanché F; Kueper R; Trumel C
    Res Vet Sci; 2008 Jun; 84(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 17826812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.