These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614747)

  • 41. Creatinine clearance: enzymatic vs Jaffé determinations of creatinine in plasma and urine.
    Apple F; Bandt C; Prosch A; Erlandson G; Holmstrom V; Scholen J; Googins M
    Clin Chem; 1986 Feb; 32(2):388-90. PubMed ID: 3943207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Paired measurement of urinary creatinine in neonates based on a Jaffe and an enzymatic IDMS-traceable assay.
    Allegaert K; Vermeersch P; Smits A; Mekahli D; Levtchenko E; Pauwels S
    BMC Nephrol; 2014 Apr; 15():62. PubMed ID: 24731305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population.
    Schmidt RL; Straseski JA; Raphael KL; Adams AH; Lehman CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143205. PubMed ID: 26599086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Negative interference from immunoglobulin M paraproteinaemia on the Roche enzymatic creatinine method.
    Flowers KC; Tuddenham E; Leiva A; Garrison L; Morris JE; Cromwell T; Boa FG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2022 May; 59(3):205-210. PubMed ID: 35133213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Investigating interferences of a whole-blood point-of-care creatinine analyzer: comparison to plasma enzymatic and definitive creatinine methods in an acute-care setting.
    Straseski JA; Lyon ME; Clarke W; Dubois JA; Phelan LA; Lyon AW
    Clin Chem; 2011 Nov; 57(11):1566-73. PubMed ID: 21920914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of bilirubin interference and accuracy of six creatinine assays compared with isotope dilution-liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
    Nah H; Lee SG; Lee KS; Won JH; Kim HO; Kim JH
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Feb; 49(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 26519089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of a species-specific C-reactive protein assay for the dog on the ABX Pentra 400 clinical chemistry analyzer.
    Hindenberg S; Klenner-Gastreich S; Kneier N; Zielinsky S; Gommeren K; Bauer N; Moritz A
    BMC Vet Res; 2017 May; 13(1):146. PubMed ID: 28558755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of five routine glucose methods on an Olympus AU5400 analyzer using the CDC hexokinase reference method.
    Jia KK; Zhang J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 20170396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What is the acceptable hemolysis index for the measurements of plasma potassium, LDH and AST?
    Rousseau N; Pige R; Cohen R; Pecquet M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2016 Jun; 74(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 27159801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Automated microanalysis of creatinine by coupled enzyme reactions.
    Asano K; Iwasaki H; Fujimura K; Ikeda M; Sugimoto Y; Matsubara A; Yano K; Irisawa H; Kono F; Kanbe M
    Hiroshima J Med Sci; 1992 Mar; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1572805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Colorimetric rate method for the determination of creatinine as implemented by the Beckman Creatinine Analyzer 2.
    Flores OR; Sun L; Vaziri ND; Miyada DS
    Am J Med Technol; 1980 Nov; 46(11):792-8. PubMed ID: 7246586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Do imipenem and cilastatin interfere with the determination of serum creatinine?].
    Dauchy F
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 May; 36(5):511-2. PubMed ID: 3043349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of three turbidimetric assays for automated determination of hemoglobin A1c.
    Barrot A; Dupuy AM; Badiou S; Bargnoux AS; Cristol JP
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(11-12):1171-7. PubMed ID: 23289186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lithium heparin interference in the Abbott enzymatic creatinine assay: the significance of under-filled tubes.
    Squires M; Wise H; Holmes H; Hadfield K
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Nov; 58(6):653-656. PubMed ID: 34463152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of a new point-of-care testing for creatinine and urea measurement.
    Bargnoux AS; Kuster N; Sutra T; Laroche L; Rodriguez A; Morena M; Chenine L; Chalabi L; Dupuy AM; Badiou S; Cristol JP
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Jul; 81(4):290-297. PubMed ID: 33908840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the Beckman Creatinine Analyzer 2.
    Cottrell DB; Frings CS
    Clin Biochem; 1979 Oct; 12(5):159-61. PubMed ID: 519846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the IRMA TRUpoint and i-STAT creatinine assays.
    Nichols JH; Bartholomew C; Bonzagi A; Garb JL; Jin L
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 377(1-2):201-5. PubMed ID: 17113060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for serum creatinine and comparison with enzymatic and Jaffe methods.
    Owen LJ; Wear JE; Keevil BG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Complex analyte-dependent and analyte-independent interferences with conjugated bilirubin in the enzymatic phenol-aminophenazone peroxidase (PAP) method for creatinine determination.
    Eng CD; Delgado R; Kroll MH
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Dec; 31(12):839-50. PubMed ID: 8136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determination of reference intervals for serum creatinine, creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance with an enzymatic and a modified Jaffé method.
    Junge W; Wilke B; Halabi A; Klein G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Jun; 344(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 15149882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.