These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614747)

  • 61. The Kodak Ektachem 400 Analyzer evaluated for automated enzymic determination of plasma creatinine.
    Smith CH; Landt M; Steelman M; Ladenson JH
    Clin Chem; 1983 Jul; 29(7):1422-5. PubMed ID: 6861349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Candidate reference method for determining serum creatinine by isocratic HPLC: validation with isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and application for accuracy assessment of routine test kits.
    Thienpont LM; Van Landuyt KG; Stöckl D; De Leenheer AP
    Clin Chem; 1995 Jul; 41(7):995-1003. PubMed ID: 7600702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques.
    Drion I; Cobbaert C; Groenier KH; Weykamp C; Bilo HJ; Wetzels JF; Kleefstra N
    BMC Nephrol; 2012 Oct; 13():133. PubMed ID: 23043743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Kinetic study of the Jaffé reaction for quantifying creatinine in serum: 2. Evaluation of buffered reagent and comparison of different data-processing options.
    Bacon BL; Pardue HL
    Clin Chem; 1989 Mar; 35(3):360-3. PubMed ID: 2920402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of the Ames, Randox and Roche methods with the Synermed method for the determination of serum iron concentrations on nondialysis and dialysis specimens.
    Nadkarni S; Allen LC
    Clin Biochem; 1998 Mar; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 9622771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Reference range and method comparison studies for enzymatic and Jaffé creatinine assays in plasma and serum and early morning urine.
    Mazzachi BC; Peake MJ; Ehrhardt V
    Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):53-5. PubMed ID: 10745982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Improved Jaffé creatinine reagent for the "Parallel" Analyzer.
    Mackay GA; Goodall GI; Woods J; Young VH
    Clin Chem; 1987 Nov; 33(11):2124. PubMed ID: 3677396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Enzymatic assay of creatinine in serum: comparison with Jaffé methods (author's transl)].
    Szász G; Börner U; Busch EW; Bablok W
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1979 Nov; 17(11):683-7. PubMed ID: 547029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Interferences in current methods for measurements of creatinine.
    Weber JA; van Zanten AP
    Clin Chem; 1991 May; 37(5):695-700. PubMed ID: 2032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Homocysteine measurement by Vitros Microtip homocysteine assay.
    Martens GA; De Nayer J; De Smet D; Couck P; Gorus F; Gerlo E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 18324911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of the Beckman creatinine analyzer.
    Hicks JM; Iosefsohn M; Lewis SA
    Clin Chem; 1979 Jun; 25(6):1005-8. PubMed ID: 445800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A Reflex Protocol for Creatinine Testing Reduces Costs and Maintains Patient Safety.
    Lehman CM; Pearson L; Salmond J; Raphael K; Schmidt RL
    Lab Med; 2019 Apr; 50(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30329079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Specificity characteristics of 7 commercial creatinine measurement procedures by enzymatic and Jaffe method principles.
    Greenberg N; Roberts WL; Bachmann LM; Wright EC; Dalton RN; Zakowski JJ; Miller WG
    Clin Chem; 2012 Feb; 58(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 22166253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of an enzymatic method for determining creatinine in plasma.
    Crocker H; Shephard MD; White GH
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 May; 41(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 3384988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays?
    Vickery S; Stevens PE; Dalton RN; van Lente F; Lamb EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2439-45. PubMed ID: 16720592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Plasma creatinine determination in mice and rats: an enzymatic method compares favorably with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay.
    Keppler A; Gretz N; Schmidt R; Kloetzer HM; Groene HJ; Lelongt B; Meyer M; Sadick M; Pill J
    Kidney Int; 2007 Jan; 71(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 17082757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Kinetic approach for the enzymic determination of creatinine.
    Perakis N; Wolff CM
    Clin Chem; 1984 Nov; 30(11):1792-6. PubMed ID: 6488523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluation of a new diagnostic kit for the enzymatic determination of creatinine.
    Lanser A; Blijenberg BG; Leijnse B
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1979 Oct; 17(10):633-8. PubMed ID: 501291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Post-standardization of routine creatinine assays: are they suitable for clinical applications.
    Jassam N; Weykamp C; Thomas A; Secchiero S; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M; Thelen M; Cobbaert C; Perich C; Ricós C; Paula FA; Barth JH
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2017 May; 54(3):386-394. PubMed ID: 27496794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A new commercial method for the enzymatic determination of creatinine in serum and urine evaluated: comparison with a kinetic Jaffé method and isotope dilution-mass spectrometry.
    Lindbäck B; Bergman A
    Clin Chem; 1989 May; 35(5):835-7. PubMed ID: 2541950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.