These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14614995)
1. Is the Health Utilities Index responsive in total hip arthroplasty patients? Blanchard C; Feeny D; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 56(11):1046-54. PubMed ID: 14614995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Feeny D; Wu L; Eng K Qual Life Res; 2004 Dec; 13(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 15651537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing community-preference-based and direct standard gamble utility scores: evidence from elective total hip arthroplasty. Feeny D; Blanchard C; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 12862193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Angst F; Aeschlimann A; Steiner W; Stucki G Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Sep; 60(9):834-40. PubMed ID: 11502609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients? Blanchard C; Feeny D; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):339-48. PubMed ID: 15085906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing short form and RAND physical and mental health summary scores: results from total hip arthroplasty and high-risk primary-care patients. Blanchard CM; Côté I; Feeny D Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 15209183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of the validity of six measures of physical function in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Gill SD; de Morton NA; Mc Burney H Clin Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 26(10):945-51. PubMed ID: 22324057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Quintana JM; Escobar A; Bilbao A; Arostegui I; Lafuente I; Vidaurreta I Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Dec; 13(12):1076-83. PubMed ID: 16154777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Mayo Hip Score: construct validity, reliability and responsiveness to change. Singh JA; Schleck C; Harmsen WS; Lewallen DG BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():39. PubMed ID: 26785640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Soohoo NF; Vyas RM; Samimi DB; Molina R; Lieberman JR J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1168-73. PubMed ID: 18078886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Wright JG; Young NL J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Mar; 50(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 9120522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty. Singh JA; Schleck C; Harmsen S; Lewallen D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():256. PubMed ID: 27286675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness and construct validity of the health utilities index in patients with dementia. Kavirajan H; Hays RD; Vassar S; Vickrey BG Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):651-61. PubMed ID: 19433998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Feeny D; Furlong W; Saigal S; Sun J Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):799-809. PubMed ID: 14672594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity to Change of a Computer Adaptive Testing Instrument for Outcome Measurement After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Periacetabular Osteotomy. McDonough CM; Stoiber E; Tomek IM; Ni P; Kim YJ; Tian F; Jette AM J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Sep; 46(9):756-67. PubMed ID: 27494055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychosocial predictors for outcome after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. Lindner M; Nosseir O; Keller-Pliessnig A; Teigelack P; Teufel M; Tagay S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):159. PubMed ID: 29788969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Neumann PJ; Sandberg EA; Araki SS; Kuntz KM; Feeny D; Weinstein MC Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 11059474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superior responsiveness of the pain and function sections of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as compared to the Lequesne-Algofunctional Index in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Theiler R; Sangha O; Schaeren S; Michel BA; Tyndall A; Dick W; Stucki G Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 1999 Nov; 7(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 10558848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a prediction model to estimate health utilities index Mark 3 utility scores from WOMAC index scores in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Marshall D; Pericak D; Grootendorst P; Gooch K; Faris P; Frank C; Bellamy N; Torrance G; Feeny D Value Health; 2008; 11(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 18489670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Escobar A; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Azkárate J; Güenaga JI Clin Rheumatol; 2002 Nov; 21(6):466-71. PubMed ID: 12447629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]