These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14615311)

  • 1. Fertilisation authority recommends a ban on sex selection.
    Kmietowicz Z
    BMJ; 2003 Nov; 327(7424):1123. PubMed ID: 14615311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive opportunities and regulatory challenges.
    Brownsword R
    Mod Law Rev; 2004 Mar; 67(2):304-21. PubMed ID: 16538741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The power to choose.
    Grayling AC
    New Sci; 2005 Apr 9-15; 186(2494):17. PubMed ID: 16007761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fertilisation, 'treatment services' and embryo 'suitability'. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Laing J
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15085819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulating embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom.
    English V
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):380-1. PubMed ID: 12194465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Watchdog approves embryo selection to treat 3 year old child.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2002 Mar; 324(7336):503. PubMed ID: 11872543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Government reviews law on "posthumous conceptions".
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Oct; 315(7112):834. PubMed ID: 9353499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK appeal court upholds embryo selection ruling.
    Ashraf H
    Lancet; 2003 Apr; 361(9366):1354. PubMed ID: 12711478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulation of assisted reproduction: the need for flexibility.
    Robertson JA
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Jan; 12(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 9043890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethicists find no justification for UK ban on sex selection of embryos.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f4333. PubMed ID: 23833081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'No' to embryos, 'yes' to sperm.
    Quintavalle J
    Lancet; 1996 Dec 21-28; 348(9043):1739. PubMed ID: 8973457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, House of Lords
    All Engl Law Rep; 2005; 2():555-70. PubMed ID: 17042106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex selection, child welfare and risk: a critique of the HFEA's recommendations on sex selection.
    Tizzard J
    Health Care Anal; 2004 Mar; 12(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 15186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem cell studies advance in Britain.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court of Appeal allows tissue typing for human embryos under strict conditions.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex selection: the response of the British Fertility Society to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority consultation document.
    Afnan M; Hunt J
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 Feb; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12663953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A tale of two youngsters: two boys, two diseases. One will be treated, one won't. Why?
    New Sci; 2002 Aug; 175(2355):3. PubMed ID: 12731534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15038888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Bureaucracy" may compromise embryo watchdog.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1991 Jun; 130(1775):16. PubMed ID: 16144096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.