450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14615450)
21. [Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma].
Li B; Wu LY; Li SM; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Ma SK
Ai Zheng; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1085-8. PubMed ID: 15363208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Markov texture parameters as prognostic indicators in endometrial cancer.
Geisler JP; Wiemann MC; Zhou Z; Miller GA; Geisler HE
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 8751546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multivariate analysis of DNA ploidy, steroid hormone receptors, and CA 125 as prognostic factors in ovarian carcinoma: a prospective study.
Eissa S; Khalifa A; Laban M; Mohamed MK; Elian A
Nutrition; 1995; 11(5 Suppl):622-6. PubMed ID: 8748237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy using flow cytometry in 1301 breast cancer patients: results of the prospective Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project.
Bergers E; Baak JP; van Diest PJ; Willig AJ; Los J; Peterse JL; Ruitenberg HM; Schapers RF; Somsen JG; van Beek MW; Bellot SM; Fijnheer J; van Gorp LH
Mod Pathol; 1997 Aug; 10(8):762-8. PubMed ID: 9267817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of proliferation markers and their prognostic value for women with endometrial carcinoma. Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and flow cytometric S-phase fraction.
Nordström B; Strang P; Bergström R; Nilsson S; Tribukait B
Cancer; 1996 Nov; 78(9):1942-51. PubMed ID: 8909315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA content as prognostic factor in cervix carcinoma stage IB-III treated with radiotherapy.
Lutgens LC; Schutte B; de Jong JM; Thunnissen FB
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Sep; 54(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 8088604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-risk endometrial carcinoma: assessment of a treatment policy based on tumor ploidy and identification of additional prognostic indicators.
Lim P; Aquino-Parsons CF; Wong F; Dupuis B; Phillips D; Zhou C; Gilks CB
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 10329033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cytophotometric studies for evaluating the prognosis in endometrial cancer].
Köhler U; Krug H; Taubert G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(24):1371-9. PubMed ID: 1808964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinoma.
Fukuda K; Mori M; Uchiyama M; Iwai K; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jun; 69(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 9648591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ten-year results of a prospective study on the prognostic role of ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: dNA aneuploidy identifies high-risk cases among the so-called 'low-risk' patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors.
Susini T; Amunni G; Molino C; Carriero C; Rapi S; Branconi F; Marchionni M; Taddei G; Scarselli G
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):882-90. PubMed ID: 17262824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA content as a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma.
Newbury R; Schuerch C; Goodspeed N; Fanning J; Glidewell O; Evans M
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 76(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 2371030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The prognostic significance of surgery, tumor size, malignancy grade, menopausal status, and DNA ploidy in endometrial stromal sarcoma.
Nordal RR; Kristensen GB; Kaern J; Stenwig AE; Pettersen EO; Tropé CG
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 8751558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prognostic impact of histological grade and vascular invasion compared with tumour cell proliferation in endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type.
Stefansson IM; Salvesen HB; Immervoll H; Akslen LA
Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 15139995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flow-cytometric DNA analysis of early stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Magtibay PM; Perrone JF; Stanhope CR; Katzmann JA; Keeney GL; Li H
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Oct; 75(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10502420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of early stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Magtibay PM; Perrone JF; Stanhope CR; Katzmann JA; Keeney GL; Li H
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Nov; 75(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 10525380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Significance of morphometric, DNA cytometric features, and other prognostic markers on survival of endometrial cancer patients in northern Norway.
Ørbo A; Rydningen M; Straume B; Lysne S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11913358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study.
Strang P; Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Stendahl U; Valdes del Campo M; Tribukait B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in endometrial cancer stage I and II: a prospective 5-year survival study.
Friberg LG; Norén H; Delle U
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8175025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
