167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14615893)
1. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.
Webb AL; Carding PN; Deary IJ; MacKenzie K; Steen N; Wilson JA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 261(8):429-34. PubMed ID: 14615893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality.
Lee M; Drinnan M; Carding P
Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 16209679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].
Núñez Batalla F; Corte Santos P; Sequeiros Santiago G; Señaris González B; Suárez Nieto C
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2004; 55(6):282-7. PubMed ID: 15491116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Mozzanica F; Ginocchio D; Borghi E; Bachmann C; Schindler A
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale.
Yamaguchi H; Shrivastav R; Andrews ML; Niimi S
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 12771466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Perceptive evaluation of substitution voices: the I(I) NFVo rating scale].
Moerman M; Martens JP; Crevier-Buchman L; Woisard V; Dejonckere P
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(5):323-5. PubMed ID: 16676554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Zraick RI; Kempster GB; Connor NP; Thibeault S; Klaben BK; Bursac Z; Thrush CR; Glaze LE
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20739631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
Alves JDN; Almeida AAF; Yamasaki R; Lopes LW
Codas; 2024; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
Yamasaki R; Madazio G; Leão SHS; Padovani M; Azevedo R; Behlau M
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 26873420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability.
Moerman M; Martens JP; Crevier-Buchman L; de Haan E; Grand S; Tessier C; Woisard V; Dejonckere P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 263(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 16404623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
