These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14615893)

  • 41. Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
    Hurren A; Hildreth AJ; Carding PN
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20070762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance.
    Dejonckere PH; Obbens C; de Moor GM; Wieneke GH
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 8325573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of perceptual training on ability to use the Vocal Profile Analysis Scheme.
    Shewell C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 1998; 33 Suppl():322-6. PubMed ID: 10343713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections for adductor spasmodic dysphonia: clinician and patient perception.
    Braden MN; Johns MM; Klein AM; Delgaudio JM; Gilman M; Hapner ER
    J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 19481417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure.
    Tezcaner ZÇ; Aksoy S
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):262.e7-262.e11. PubMed ID: 27427180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers.
    Arunachalam R; Boominathan P; Mahalingam S
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):128.e1-128.e9. PubMed ID: 24275462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale-VoiSS.
    Moreti F; Zambon F; Oliveira G; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):458-68. PubMed ID: 24560004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reliability of speaking and maximum voice range measures in screening for dysphonia.
    Ma E; Robertson J; Radford C; Vagne S; El-Halabi R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 16678387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development and validation of the children's voice handicap index-10 (CVHI-10).
    Ricci-Maccarini A; De Maio V; Murry T; Schindler A
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):258.e23-258.e28. PubMed ID: 23257212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality.
    De Bodt MS; Wuyts FL; Van de Heyning PH; Croux C
    J Voice; 1997 Mar; 11(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9075179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The effect of anchor voices and visible speech in training in the GRABS scale of perceptual evaluation of dysphonia].
    Núñez-Batalla F; Díaz-Molina JP; García-López I; Moreno-Méndez A; Costales-Marcos M; Moreno-Galindo C; Martínez-Camblor P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2012; 63(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 22153964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
    Zraick RI; Wendel K; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 16301103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Study on the stability of perceptual evaluation of voice quality].
    Wang G; Yu P; Xu W; Wen W; Wei CS; Huang DY; Hou LZ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 21924100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.